Originally posted by northernladuk
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Public sector outside IR35 if caught , number years I am liable get less"
Collapse
-
How have you managed to dodge their two year rule?
DfE were full of permatractors that should have been deemed inside back in the day so no idea how they haven't. So many people part and parcel there it's not true.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Amanensia View PostYes, any incorrect determination post April 2017 is your client’s problem, not yours. And if they’ve deemed you inside I’d be amazed if HMRC went after you for earlier years.
Leave a comment:
-
Yes, any incorrect determination post April 2017 is your client’s problem, not yours. And if they’ve deemed you inside I’d be amazed if HMRC went after you for earlier years.
Leave a comment:
-
Public sector outside IR35 if caught , number years I am liable get less
Is this correct?
I am a public sector , Dept of Education contractor with a outside IR35 contract since April 2017, and have been with them total 6 year now.
Let says I am investigated tomorrow,and they claim I need to pay 6 year back dated Tax, NI etc
Would I be right in assuming that the last 2 years 7 months up to April 2017, I would not be liable to for any tax claims as per the new off payroll rules, where the Client ( Dept of Education) is responsible and they would have to pay?
The years before 2.7 years - i.e 3 years 4 months - I would be liable as I would have been personally liable to determine my IR35 status.
What I am getting at, is my liability less due to the new rules that commenced in April 2017, where the Client is responsible for the determination and the tax.
Thus each year that passes, my own personal liability within the 6 year time frame will get less and the client get more?
Or am I barking up a wrong tree with this scenario?
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why party conference season 2025 is a self-employment policy litmus test Today 09:53
- Labour decommissions Freelance Commissioner idea Yesterday 08:56
- Is it legal to work remotely from Europe via a UK company? Sep 5 22:44
- Is it legal to work remotely from Europe via a UK company? Sep 5 10:44
- Autumn Budget 2025 set for Nov 26, ‘putting contractors on watch’ Sep 4 15:13
- November 2025 Companies House ID rules contractors must follow Sep 3 19:12
- When agencies sink with your contractor invoice: a legal guide Sep 2 17:14
- Reeves ‘to raise VAT registration threshold to £100,000’ Sep 1 06:37
- When your agency shuts: a recruiter’s 5 tips if you’re unpaid Aug 29 06:57
- What the 2025 employment status review means for contractors Aug 28 06:39
Leave a comment: