Originally posted by jamesbrown
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "More reasons for blanket inside assessments?"
Collapse
-
Clients that want contractors will bother because, well, that is the law. Clients that don't, won't, obviously. Of the subset that don't, some will offer FTCs. Of the subset that don't offer FTCs, few will operate payroll themselves, I expect. That is my point. So most of that article is pointless and your OP about there now being "more reasons" to make a blanket inside determination is not coherent.Originally posted by JohntheBike View Postyes, but I would contend that clients wouldn't want any hassle, so they are likely to offload all roles to a brolly. It's an easier decision rather than attempting any assessments at all. Granted, they'd have to weigh up the possible negative affects on their business, but I guess short term considerations would prevail.
There is "a" reason to avoid contractors altogether, namely that it's their responsibility to make a determination now, but that reason has existed since the proposal was announced and has nothing to do with "blanketing". Blanketing means issuing an SDS that says "this contract is inside" and repeating that for a group of contracts. Umbrella companies have employees. So I think the confusion partly stems from your confused use of terminology and partly from nothing having changed recently.
Leave a comment:
-
At least HR system providers might make a few quid on the back of the IR35 changes doing updates!
Every cloud, etc.
Leave a comment:
-
yes, but I would contend that clients wouldn't want any hassle, so they are likely to offload all roles to a brolly. It's an easier decision rather than attempting any assessments at all. Granted, they'd have to weigh up the possible negative affects on their business, but I guess short term considerations would prevail.Originally posted by jamesbrown View PostSeems to be some confusion here. For outside contracts, none of this admin applies. For inside contracts, I doubt they are going to bother with payroll. They will push that off to an umbrella or offer FTCs (proper temp employment w/ standard PAYE accounting). Either way, I think this article describes a massive disincentive to blanket inside *and* to handle the payroll internally.
Leave a comment:
-
Seems to be some confusion here. For outside contracts, none of this admin applies. For inside contracts, I doubt they are going to bother with payroll. They will push that off to an umbrella or offer FTCs (proper temp employment w/ standard PAYE accounting). Either way, I think this article describes a massive disincentive to blanket inside *and* to handle the payroll internally.
Leave a comment:
-
I thought so. To clarify, the clients will say to themselves that everyone is inside and to avoid the hassles, every contractor who wishes to provide services to them must do so through a brolly.Originally posted by simes View PostIsn't that what JtB said?
Leave a comment:
-
Not necessarily. Why go through all the pain of a meaningless "assessment" process? I would simply state that as of X date I will not accept LtdCo contractors and everyone should now go via a brolly if I were a client. Job done.Originally posted by JohntheBike View Postso blanket inside assessments and everybody through a brolly?
Leave a comment:
-
so blanket inside assessments and everybody through a brolly?Originally posted by simes View PostAs you say...
Leave a comment:
-
More reasons for blanket inside assessments?
From ‘off-payroll’ to on-payroll: It’s not simple | AccountingWEB
looks like a minefield for clientsTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How to run a limited company — efficiently: smarter profit strategies Feb 27 07:13
- IR35 & Mutuality of Obligation in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 26 07:32
- Post Office hit with ‘crazy’ £104million HMRC bill for IR35 failings Feb 25 07:03
- IR35 & Right of Substitution in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 24 06:59
- Why Rupert Lowe MP’s Restore Britain has it wrong on IR35 Feb 23 07:21
- IR35 & Control in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 20 07:13
- How key for IR35 will Control be in 2026/27? Feb 20 07:13
- Changes to non-compete clauses in employment contracts require ministers to tread carefully Feb 19 07:59
- What does the non-compete clause consultation mean for contractors? Feb 19 07:59
- To escalate or wait? With late payment, even month two is too late Feb 18 07:26

Leave a comment: