• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "A quote from way back"

Collapse

  • BoredBloke
    replied
    The point In was trying to make with his quote was that Hammond is clearly criticising IR35 for its effect on making the economy less flexible, when it was tory party policy. Fast forward and he is the chancellor and he makes it many times worse by removing any ability to offset travel and accommodation costs against tax.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by WordIsBond View Post
    If they increased dividend tax rates to 10% or even 12.5% on close companies, to reduce tax-motivated incorporation, and then abolished IR35 as no longer needed, at least you'd have the ability to flexibly run your business.
    This is pretty much how it works in Switzerland - there is simply no tax relief on dividends. It is treated as income. I declare dividends and retain income during good years, pay only salary in bad years.

    Leave a comment:


  • WordIsBond
    replied
    However, a large number of small businesses will never be anything other than just that. Many of them are one-man, self-employed enterprises. They, in particular, deliver a swing capability to our economy that is vital to the fast-moving responsiveness that we need if we are to continue to be flexible.

    I am sure that the Chancellor would recognise that as the economy and the fortunes of firms move, they must be able to adjust the costs that they bear. The one-man business is uniquely able to adjust its cost in response to the changing environment: it makes more money one year, less the next. Typically, such a business will not require large streams of investment capability, so it can absorb changes in the environment in a way that larger and more structured businesses cannot.
    One of the most egregious parts of IR35 is that you can't smooth out your personal income, as far as tax is concerned. If you make more money one year, you get pounded on tax even if you don't make any the next year. You are personally taxed on business income rather than on personal income.

    If they increased dividend tax rates to 10% or even 12.5% on close companies, to reduce tax-motivated incorporation, and then abolished IR35 as no longer needed, at least you'd have the ability to flexibly run your business.

    Leave a comment:


  • BoredBloke
    started a topic A quote from way back

    A quote from way back

    We need to focus on the flexibility that microbusinesses and small businesses deliver because they provide a unique adjustment factor in the economy. One reason why the Government's IR35 initiative has been so damaging and destructive is the fact that it has hit at the most flexible part of the economy.

    Any guesses who said that?

    Small Business (Regulatory Burden) (Hansard, 6 November 2001)

Working...
X