Originally posted by DealorNoDeal
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Does what HMRC are saying sound right?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Does what HMRC are saying sound right?"
Collapse
-
Do as advised and get professional advice quickly. Do not trust HMRC. I followed their 'advice' once and then they reneged on their own 'advice.'
-
No, they were a PAYE employee, which is presumably why no SATRs were filed at the time.Originally posted by webberg View PostWas the scheme one which claimed self employment?
Leave a comment:
-
Was the scheme one which claimed self employment?Originally posted by DealorNoDeal View Post1) Yes, except they've been given until the end of Feb (I'm guessing they were given 3 months or so from the date of the letter)
2) Noted, but if they don't go along with this then 2015/16 & 2016/17 would be subject to the LC
It all just seems a bit arbitrary. Two of the years paid through self-assessment; the other two through the LC.
Leave a comment:
-
1) Yes, except they've been given until the end of Feb (I'm guessing they were given 3 months or so from the date of the letter)Originally posted by webberg View PostHMRC recently requested that they submit SATRs for 2015/16 and 2016/17. 1) So presumably the request was made in 2019 and the returns are due to be submitted before the end of this month?
HMRC have now told them that they should declare the 2015/16 & 2016/17 loans as income on these SATRs, and pay the additional tax. 2) Well they would, wouldn't they? It's just their opinion.
2) Noted, but if they don't go along with this then 2015/16 & 2016/17 would be subject to the LC
It all just seems a bit arbitrary. Two of the years paid through self-assessment; the other two through the LC.
Leave a comment:
-
No it makes little sense. Professional advice is needed.Originally posted by DealorNoDeal View PostPerson was in loan scheme 4 years 2015/16, 2016/17, 2017/18 and 2018/19.
They hadn't previously submitted any SATRs.
HMRC recently requested that they submit SATRs for 2015/16 and 2016/17. So presumably the request was made in 2019 and the returns are due to be submitted before the end of this month?
HMRC have now told them that they should declare the 2015/16 & 2016/17 loans as income on these SATRs, and pay the additional tax. Well they would, wouldn't they? It's just their opinion.
And then, only 2017/18 & 2018/19 would be subject to the Loan Charge.
This might be aok but seems a bit strange.
Leave a comment:
-
Does what HMRC are saying sound right?
Person was in loan scheme 4 years 2015/16, 2016/17, 2017/18 and 2018/19.
They hadn't previously submitted any SATRs.
HMRC recently requested that they submit SATRs for 2015/16 and 2016/17.
HMRC have now told them that they should declare the 2015/16 & 2016/17 loans as income on these SATRs, and pay the additional tax.
And then, only 2017/18 & 2018/19 would be subject to the Loan Charge.
This might be aok but seems a bit strange.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Today 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Yesterday 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36
- The JSL legislation we’ll surely get just dropped. Here’s 4 ‘indelibles’ Dec 10 07:26

Leave a comment: