Reply to: How to find who is trustee? Gone AWOL

[DealorNoDeal]

Start here.

About - Giles Morris

I thought the name rang a bell.

"...in May 2001 AJ and I became involved in new commercial litigation, with a different protagonist, one Edward Watkin Gittins, over a disputed tax planning scheme. This litigation, which lasted for over 14 years..."

[webberg]

Start here.

About - Giles Morris

[kryten22uk]

Yes I do have them.

I'm not going to post them here.

If you used the scheme, you would have had the missive I referred to and the relevant contact details.

I'm aware that one contact will be looking to charge a fee for helping, so you will have to decide if that is worth the cost.

I did use the scheme, they provided my loans summary and I settled with HMRC. I don't really know what a 'missive' is but the only Comms (other than the list of loans) was the original email I posted earlier in this thread. That gave no contact details other than the email address for 'Contractor Loans Assist' that it came from. Whilst they provided my loans info from that email, they never responded to my emails afterwards. So still stuck when it comes to my attempts to get loans written off.

I've tried googling combinations of Fidei/missive/trust/loans etc, but no cigar.

[webberg]

Yes I do have them.

I'm not going to post them here.

If you used the scheme, you would have had the missive I referred to and the relevant contact details.

I'm aware that one contact will be looking to charge a fee for helping, so you will have to decide if that is worth the cost.

[kryten22uk]

Mr Jones retired last year due to ill health.

He sent around a missive to all his clients suggesting that they contact us (WTT) or an accountant on the IOM who I believe was a family member.

We (WTT) do not administer or have any authority over the trust.

We do know who the other party is.

I suggest that in the first place you search for the above missive, around Q3 last year.

Then you need to contact me.

Bumping this incase anyone has any contact details for Fidei?

Webberg I tried on/call but haven't managed to get thru to you. Any chance you've still got contact ideas?
Ta

[Bemi]

Because I have read your posts and you seem way to precious and demanding of other people without seeming to make any effort yourself. That's why.

I believe you missed an "in my humble opinion" somewhere there. Perhaps after the insult?

I am confused though. You claim I don't make effort myself, but I have shared what I have learnt with others. That seems like effort. In fact I got attacked for it by strangers I'd never met... You may remember it... You were one of them.

I also took the time and effort to write you PM in a sincere effort to open dialogue. You did not take the effort to reply to it. But I'm glad you found the time to think of another insult to throw at me.

Thanks for your time.

Yours, Precious

[webberg]

I have spoken with "Bemi" and we have had a discussion in which we have agreed on some things and not on others.

In particular I think he has a desire for information and I have imparted some of what I know.

I will therefore respond to reasonable questions subject to time and my understanding of the situation.

[dammit chloe]

Can you in any way engage with my responses or in any way back up either of these comments?

'suss' and 'massive sense of self importance' are simply insults thrown at a stranger. How is that not just bullying?

Because I have read your posts and you seem way to precious and demanding of other people without seeming to make any effort yourself. That's why.

[webberg]

"Bemi" has indeed been in touch and we will be speaking later this week.

I will in the meantime say that my post above contains no hint of personal commentary and instead indicates that I have decided that in this instance I need more information before spending a lot of time answering some of the questions asked.

He has reached out and once we have spoken, perhaps things will change.

[Bemi]

My PM to Dammit Chloe

Not sure what I can do but try and engage with people and defend myself. Below is the PM I just sent to Chloe

Hi Chloe,

I don't know if you're just a troll but happy to speak on here if you have any legitimate issues.

I don't know what else I can do other than defend myself, in detail against vague claims and insults, and offer to talk?

What exactly do you want from me other than to have a go at me?

I haven't even been told why I'm suss? What on earth am I meant to do with that? And don't you have a history of accusing people of being stooges? Yet you're accusing me of self importance! Really?

If you're genuine get in touch. If you don't in any way engage with me why on earth would I believe you to be anything but a troll or bully?

James

[Bemi]

Please, your posts are suss and display a massive sense of self-importance. Time to ignore.

Can you in any way engage with my responses or in any way back up either of these comments?

'suss' and 'massive sense of self importance' are simply insults thrown at a stranger. How is that not just bullying?

[dammit chloe]

Anyone reading this please note

I have sent Webberg a private message verifying who I am

Webberg made NO ATTEMPT to contact me before making this public accusation.

I am already in contact with the firm that Webberg sells services for, as I have stated on other topics, so I am surprised he has missed or chosen to ignore this.

Nowhere in his rather long message did he actually back up any of his accusations. He has not attempted to explain or justify what it is about the content or tone of what I have said that is in any way dodgy. It's just a vague slur that he's for some reason decided to throw at me.

I have not made many posts and they are all available to view from my account. I am very happy for people to read them and make their own judgements, and to PM me if they have questions. I will, however, respond strongly to bullies especially when they are using this forum to sell private services.

I am not happy to post my personal details on a public forum used by HMRC (and probably by THL, Baker Tilly etc) and I ask you to consider whether Webberg suggesting I should do this is in any way reasonable.

You have my number Webberg. I look forward to your call and some sort of reasonable explanation.

Please, your posts are suss and display a massive sense of self-importance. Time to ignore.

[Bemi]

I hope I've shown that I've attempted to treat questions and queries coming through here in a fair and honest manner. I do so based on the assumption that most posters are genuine seekers of information and are able to use that to put their own situation into context and to find a strategy that they can live with.

I have not ever questioned the motives of posters nor implied that they might have commercial interests that are in conflict to the majority of those genuinely seeking information.

(Indeed to do so would be hypocritical given that I founded a firm that specialises in contractor tax enquiries. I've always been open about that and where appropriate asked people to bear the possible conflict in mind even when I've done my best to be objective).

In your case however, for the first time, I am wondering if there are motives in play beyond seeking information?

I am not sure and probably never will be.

I am however, until you can show me otherwise via declaring your identity in a manner I can verify, either here or via a PM or I'll give you my email, going to assume that the tone, content and direction of your posts implies rather more knowledge than you profess to have.

As such I will not be responding to any more of your posts until I have such proof.

Anyone reading this please note

I have sent Webberg a private message verifying who I am

Webberg made NO ATTEMPT to contact me before making this public accusation.

I am already in contact with the firm that Webberg sells services for, as I have stated on other topics, so I am surprised he has missed or chosen to ignore this.

Nowhere in his rather long message did he actually back up any of his accusations. He has not attempted to explain or justify what it is about the content or tone of what I have said that is in any way dodgy. It's just a vague slur that he's for some reason decided to throw at me.

I have not made many posts and they are all available to view from my account. I am very happy for people to read them and make their own judgements, and to PM me if they have questions. I will, however, respond strongly to bullies especially when they are using this forum to sell private services.

I am not happy to post my personal details on a public forum used by HMRC (and probably by THL, Baker Tilly etc) and I ask you to consider whether Webberg suggesting I should do this is in any way reasonable.

You have my number Webberg. I look forward to your call and some sort of reasonable explanation.

[webberg]

Sorry if this has been covered elsewhere, but can anyone tell me who the trustee is now for the Winchester scheme?

I hope I've shown that I've attempted to treat questions and queries coming through here in a fair and honest manner. I do so based on the assumption that most posters are genuine seekers of information and are able to use that to put their own situation into context and to find a strategy that they can live with.

I have not ever questioned the motives of posters nor implied that they might have commercial interests that are in conflict to the majority of those genuinely seeking information.

(Indeed to do so would be hypocritical given that I founded a firm that specialises in contractor tax enquiries. I've always been open about that and where appropriate asked people to bear the possible conflict in mind even when I've done my best to be objective).

In your case however, for the first time, I am wondering if there are motives in play beyond seeking information?

I am not sure and probably never will be.

I am however, until you can show me otherwise via declaring your identity in a manner I can verify, either here or via a PM or I'll give you my email, going to assume that the tone, content and direction of your posts implies rather more knowledge than you profess to have.

As such I will not be responding to any more of your posts until I have such proof.

[Bemi]

Winchester scheme trustee?

Sorry if this has been covered elsewhere, but can anyone tell me who the trustee is now for the Winchester scheme?

Also, is there no legislation covering the conduct of loan holders and how it is passed on? It seems insane that they can pass on a loan without providing any information to the borrower, and just ignore requests for information. That does seem like a legal loophole you could drive a bus through...