I am surprised hmrc lost and would think an appeal likely.
However it shows how high the bar was placed in this instance.
I would have thought it might give some limited comfort to some scheme users.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "HMRC fails at FTT to transfer tax liability from employer to employee"
Collapse
-
Reading through the article, it was fair that HMRC lost here. The employee received remuneration after tax and so cannot be held liable.
Leave a comment:
-
Actually, HMRC has changed this line to "almost 90%". Check their latest press releases.Originally posted by Whysoserious View PostMakes for interesting reading. Another failure for HMRC, one that will not be published or included in their "80%" success rate.
And if you wonder why that is, you can check here.
Leave a comment:
-
In fairness to HMRC, reading that it seems to me that it was a deliberate move to avoid paying the PAYE deductions that were due. Cute application of the tax law but not one I would regard as being something that would stand up to widespread (ab)use.Originally posted by Whysoserious View PostMakes for interesting reading. Another failure for HMRC, one that will not be published or included in their "80%" success rate.
https://www.rpc.co.uk/perspectives/t...d=1062735&jb=0
I'd certainly expect HMRC to appeal it.
Leave a comment:
-
HMRC fails at FTT to transfer tax liability from employer to employee
Makes for interesting reading. Another failure for HMRC, one that will not be published or included in their "80%" success rate.
https://www.rpc.co.uk/perspectives/t...d=1062735&jb=0Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Today 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Yesterday 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51

Leave a comment: