Originally posted by BrilloPad
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: I'm coming to the conclusion...
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "I'm coming to the conclusion..."
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Vegas View PostWhat is really infuriating is that Google gets away with sweetheart deals and contractors get hammered with APNs and a 4%rise in tax (dividend tax). It is fcking outrageous. Osborne is truly a swine.
One reason contractors are under attack is so that big consultancies can take over.
Leave a comment:
-
What is really infuriating is that Google gets away with sweetheart deals and contractors get hammered with APNs and a 4%rise in tax (dividend tax). It is fcking outrageous. Osborne is truly a swine.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DotasScandal View PostI have yet to understand why we are at the receiving end of this vendetta....
Until someone offers a compelling alternative explanation, I'll have to stick to my interpretation that they (those who "gave" us these laws) simply got terribly offended by the fact that some "plebs" dared dip their toe (knowingly or not) into an activity that they see as reserved to "them".
Originally posted by TheDandy View PostMoney ! Someone thinks we are all loaded. Trying to understand will drive you crazy. Weird but I find solace in the fight. Maybe I'll implode at the end.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DotasScandal View PostWhat is difficult to understand is that the judiciary is so cool with blatant denial of justice.
Also, I think we're up there with jihadis and paedos in terms of public opinion. Not many judges would want to be seen siding with tax dodgers in the current climate.
If you had a time machine, and could go back 10 years, you might stand a better chance in court.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DotasScandal View PostI have yet to understand why we are at the receiving end of this vendetta....
Until someone offers a compelling alternative explanation, I'll have to stick to my interpretation that they (those who "gave" us these laws) simply got terribly offended by the fact that some "plebs" dared dip their toe (knowingly or not) into an activity that they see as reserved to "them".
Leave a comment:
-
I have yet to understand why we are at the receiving end of this vendetta....
Until someone offers a compelling alternative explanation, I'll have to stick to my interpretation that they (those who "gave" us these laws) simply got terribly offended by the fact that some "plebs" dared dip their toe (knowingly or not) into an activity that they see as reserved to "them".
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by LandRover View PostI kind of think even HMRC couldn't dream up the vindictive legislation that was announced in Budget.
Gauke & Osborne are driving all this and HMRC are the enforcers. IMO.
In Gauke & Osborne we have two Psychopaths who are all out to trample over British Law and bring about the destruction of thousands in their merciless retrospective legislation.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DotasScandal View PostI agree. And that whole process will take...?
"Justice delayed is justice denied", it is said.
Which is, in fact, their whole point.
With APN payment terms, hardly see how bankruptcy is avoidable. Welcome to the UK.
Frankly, the whole plan was transparent from inception.
What is difficult to understand is that the judiciary is so cool with blatant denial of justice.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TheDandy View PostExperience to date means I can only agree with you entirely. It's unlikely there was ever any intention for sensible engagement by HMRC. The only chance of fighting this will be in the courts, and one will have to be prepared to start out expecting to go all the way to the Supreme Court.
"Justice delayed is justice denied", it is said.
Which is, in fact, their whole point.
With APN payment terms, hardly see how bankruptcy is avoidable. Welcome to the UK.
Frankly, the whole plan was transparent from inception.
What is difficult to understand is that the judiciary is so cool with blatant denial of justice.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostOf course you are entitled to your opinion.
Having been through the mill with f4j, when S58 came along I knew discussion would not work. NTRT fought hard - but finally discovered that discussion gets you nowhere.
Carry on going down that path if you want.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by LandRover View PostI kind of think even HMRC couldn't dream up the vindictive legislation that was announced in Budget.
Gauke & Osborne are driving all this and HMRC are the enforcers. IMO.
In Gauke & Osborne we have two Psychopaths who are all out to trample over British Law and bring about the destruction of thousands in their merciless retrospective legislation.
Having been through the mill with f4j, when S58 came along I knew discussion would not work. NTRT fought hard - but finally discovered that discussion gets you nowhere.
Carry on going down that path if you want.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostNo. You still don't understand do you.
HMRC run the government.
Gauke & Osborne are driving all this and HMRC are the enforcers. IMO.
In Gauke & Osborne we have two Psychopaths who are all out to trample over British Law and bring about the destruction of thousands in their merciless retrospective legislation.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BattleCry View PostGauke is with the 'In' camp so brexit is more likely to spell demotion for him.
Leave a comment:
-
Gauke is with the 'In' camp so brexit is more likely to spell demotion for him.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
- Micro-entity accounts: Overview, and how to file with HMRC Nov 6 09:27
Leave a comment: