- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "HMRC cranking up the time machine again ..."
Collapse
-
I didn't explain myself very well :-) There are quite a few high profile tax stories that have been linked in various threads (and many more to come no doubt). They come in, are fashionable for five minutes, then go away. Is it possible that some of these stories might provide some leverage going forward and could be worth keeping a track of? Bernie's case as an example. The circumstances are different to scheme enquiries of course but if, say in 16 months time HMRC agree to a £250 million settlement it would be reported as such on the BBC website. We'd have all forgotten HMRC had originally wanted £1Bn off him. Reduced settlement?!? Did we ever get to the bottom of George Osborne encouraging tax avoidance live on radio? That kind of thing ... Like I said, just a thought :-)
-
Judge Parker is on the case - poor Bernie doesn't stand a chance.Originally posted by squirrel View PostF1's Ecclestone in legal challenge over £1bn tax move - BBC News
obviously we don't know the full facts of the case so the BBC may have put a slant on it, but do we think there's any benefit in collating all these kind of stories in one thread for future reference? Not so we can bemoan our plight, it does absolutely stink, but with so many of them being reported these days there may be the odd little gem / decision in the future from a story now that could assist in some way (not trying to step on anyones toes, just a thought)...
Leave a comment:
-
Looks to me as though some information came out of the bribery case in Germany (thus negating the whole point of paying the bribe) that caused HMRC to review the position.
They seem to be basing the re-opening of the settlement on the fact that not everything was disclosed. One of the key terms of any settlement is full disclosure.
Whilst I'm sure he can afford the best lawyers, I'm backing HMRC on this one.
Leave a comment:
-
F'ing disgusting, targeting an old man. Target drug smugglers and what not for goodness sakes!!!!
Leave a comment:
-
Absolutely agree with you there, I wasn't entirely trying to comment on the case (although I will concede my thread title does suggest I am).Originally posted by malvolio View PostSo nothing to do with an agreed settlement in 2008 where he said the trust's funds were completely out of his control then two years later uses them to pay a personal debt then...?
Leave a comment:
-
So nothing to do with an agreed settlement in 2008 where he said the trust's funds were completely out of his control then two years later uses them to pay a personal debt then...?
Leave a comment:
-
Oops
That went in the wrong section!!! Any chance of getting this moved into HMRC Scheme Enquiries please?

Leave a comment:
-
HMRC cranking up the time machine again ...
F1's Ecclestone in legal challenge over £1bn tax move - BBC News
obviously we don't know the full facts of the case so the BBC may have put a slant on it, but do we think there's any benefit in collating all these kind of stories in one thread for future reference? Not so we can bemoan our plight, it does absolutely stink, but with so many of them being reported these days there may be the odd little gem / decision in the future from a story now that could assist in some way (not trying to step on anyones toes, just a thought)...Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Today 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Yesterday 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36

Leave a comment: