I agree exclude expenses.
I would also set the salary at the 90th percentile for the relevant pay range, these are of course exceptional staff that aren't available in the UK.
Taxation would be from day one and monthly so they can't spend six months here and six months in India and avoid tax. so £60K salary declared they would pay six months PAYE as if they were going to work all year.
And no subbing out.
That would sort the men from the boys. But of course they would just pay them for 6 months and give them an unpaid internship for 6 months.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Canada gets to grip with undercutting by onshored intra-company transfer workers"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View PostThey'd just close down the debate by accussing you of being racist
I just want business expenses excluded from the UKBA definition of salary just like they already do for chefs (standard occupation code 5435)
Their sponsors can then decide if they want to onshore them at the UK taxable salary rate or hire a resident worker or contractor instead.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by backthemac View PostI'm not so sure. Using the governments own pay scale tables for migrant IT workers on a rate of £30,000 over £250m is lost because of the UKBA rules in treating business expenses as 'salary' for onshored workers to get to the rate required for the visa. As most of these bods are working on client contract and the rates will be double that you are looking at over £500m per annum as a subsidy to their sponsoring companies.
I would like to see Cameron or Clegg put on the spot and defend that in the run up to the next election. They have no problem bashing the bankers or Amazon or Google but then that is easy because they cannot do anything about that. Here they can.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View PostWith pressure groups like the 'Friend of India' in Parliament lobbying for more offshoring, you've got more chance of get IR35 scrapped
I would like to see Cameron or Clegg put on the spot and defend that in the run up to the next election. They have no problem bashing the bankers or Amazon or Google but then that is easy because they cannot do anything about that. Here they can.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View PostWith pressure groups like the 'Friend of India' in Parliament lobbying for more offshoring, you've got more chance of get IR35 scrapped
Leave a comment:
-
With pressure groups like the 'Friend of India' in Parliament lobbying for more offshoring, you've got more chance of get IR35 scrapped
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by CoolCat View Posteveryone should do the same
Leave a comment:
-
looks really good, when can we implement in UK?
maybe worth sending to our Nige to raise as an issue?
If Canada succeed then UK could follow.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by backthemac View PostSomeone in Canada appears to have woken up to what is going on and no pissing about with some 'review' to kick it into the long grass for 18 months as happens here in the UK when they want to avoid making any decision which requires a bit of backbone.
In Canada this change is with immediate effect.
Expanded Guidelines for Officers Assessing Work Permit Applications for Intra-Company Transferees with Specialized Knowledge
BackTheMAC - Home
Leave a comment:
-
Canada gets to grip with undercutting by onshored intra-company transfer workers
Someone in Canada appears to have woken up to what is going on and no pissing about with some 'review' to kick it into the long grass for 18 months as happens here in the UK when they want to avoid making any decision which requires a bit of backbone.
In Canada this change is with immediate effect.
Expanded Guidelines for Officers Assessing Work Permit Applications for Intra-Company Transferees with Specialized Knowledge
BackTheMAC - HomeTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: