• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Any one fancy an aluminium E type?"

Collapse

  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    A mate of mine has a 420G.

    Which, apparently is a MK X in disguise.

    Jaguar Mark X - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    LOL. I was just about to post almost the same link.

    I saw an excellent example on display at an "Old Timers" day in 2011 and I'm looking at the piccies I took.

    Wooden picnic tables in the back, chrome door and window handles and of course leather seats (front ones a bit worn).

    Poking my head in the window I could still catch a bit of the lovely smell they had.

    Three carburettors, which someone who'd had an E-Type in the 60s/70s told us were a nightmare to keep in tune with each other.

    265PS @ 5400rpm, 195km/h max speed. 1966-1970, 1125 of 'em built.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    Won't idle at the moment coz of that weird little electrick idle carb thing that certain SU's had.
    Later Jags use much more advanced technology to not idle properly!

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    1967 Ferrari 275 GTB/4 by Scaglietti | Monterey 2014 | RM AUCTIONS

    More my cup of tea.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    A mate of mine has a 420G.

    Which, apparently is a MK X in disguise.

    Jaguar Mark X - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Is it a stunning as the examples in the piccies or is it a bit more like this;

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    A Mk 10 would be rather nice.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    According to that article there's only going to be 6 of them.

    So all the panels will be shaped by panel bashing & wheeling etc.

    Very skilled sort of stuff.
    Indeed. Proper craftsmanship.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost View Post
    The tooling for the E type was scrapped back in the 70s* so this really must be a labour of love.
    The panels can be hand beaten, as they may well have been on the originals. It was quite common in those days, you can't just buy a new panel for a 60s Ferrari for example, or even swap them between cars, because the minor differences in manufacture and hand finishing mean they won't line up properly.

    I am wondering where the engine blocks are coming from, are they going to make new moulds? Will they use a period alloy? I can't help but think with modern alloys and CNC machine tools they are going to be better than the originals.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    never liked the XJ, much preferred the later S type.

    Haven't they just released a £1/4 million new E type ?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost View Post
    Jaguar hand-builds six E-Types - BT

    Should stop 'em rusting as quick as the standard E then.

    The tooling for the E type was scrapped back in the 70s* so this really must be a labour of love.


    *Would you expect anything different from BL?
    Yes please, if I can scratch together a couple of bazillion quid.

    And no, I wouldn't have expected anything different from BL. Idiots. Even their best moments turned to poo; the XJ series III was stunning, with a classic design ever so slightly tweaked by Pininfarina. What a shame that they built it so badly. I assume this new E type will be more sturdily bolted and welded together.

    Leave a comment:


  • zeitghost
    started a topic Any one fancy an aluminium E type?

    Any one fancy an aluminium E type?

    Jaguar hand-builds six E-Types - BT

    Should stop 'em rusting as quick as the standard E then.

    The tooling for the E type was scrapped back in the 70s* so this really must be a labour of love.


    *Would you expect anything different from BL?

Working...
X