• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Post IR35 World

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Post IR35 World"

Collapse

  • oraclesmith
    replied
    We're not post IR35, so don't do anything rash. According to other posts, which are no more than insider rumours really, the HMRC is scaling down their efforts re. IR35, but they're not dropping the legislation. In my humble opinion they would still go after cases where they think they have a good chance of getting lots of tax back.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ardesco
    replied
    I thought it was 7 years they could go back if you failed an IR35 check. I may be wrong though so some confirmation would be good

    However I must admit i'm just chucking cash into a savings account just in case the worst should happen anyway. I suppose I should look at other forms of company investment, high interest account can't be the best way to save the money (Although it is probably the safest).

    Leave a comment:


  • Bovvered
    replied
    You'll notice I said "MY" rule. It is something I have adhered to, along with peppering my accounts with all sorts of extra sales incomes (along side my daily contracting) in my personal endeavour to ensure my accounts are those of a business and not an employee.

    If you have a problem with my being cautious then that's up to you.

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Nice to know people are paying attention...

    The "two year rule" is nothing to do with IR35, it's to do with employment rights being acquired. And it's not two years, in Dacas and Muscat it was taken to be around 12 months. And better legal commentators than me have then argued that if it applies after 12 months, it applies after 1 day. And if you have a proper B22B contract, or a contract that clearly takes you away from being an employee, it can't apply anyway.

    That sounds like an IR35 argument but it isn't. The difference is that IR35 is a personal taxation question and the one-year-employee is an employment rights one: different departments (HMRC and DTI), different criteria, different outcomes even in the same overall situation.

    So before you make business decisions, I suggest you learn the reasons why you should do one thing or another.

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by Bovvered
    Well, what great news.
    I think I may scrap my two-year-max-for-a-client rule which will make things easier going forwards too.
    But then you would lose your travel expenses

    Leave a comment:


  • Bovvered
    started a topic Post IR35 World

    Post IR35 World

    Well, what great news. Having maticulously saved for any possible IR35 comeback, on top of my other savings, I know find myself in an even better position! Gordo has actually done something positive for me!

    I think I may scrap my two-year-max-for-a-client rule which will make things easier going forwards too.
Working...
X