• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "UKIP Voting profile"

Collapse

  • oracleslave
    replied
    Originally posted by MyUserName View Post
    I currently on game 3 (I think, maybe 4) with him and am yet to win!
    Lost game 2 but got closer this time.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    The educational stats. I'm sure you can read it for yourself. Or maybe you can't.
    Of course it's a generalisation since not everyone with a poor education is stupid, but in general those with a poor education are on the left of the bell-curve.
    Particularly as for the older, post-war demographic, high quality education would have been free and based on merit, unlike the young of today who have really got a raw deal.
    you mean having a degree?

    now if you read the summary they pointed out degrees were only obtained by a small percentage of the population in earlier years. Few aspired to degrees and few would have been accepted by universities. More modern degrees handed out like cornflakes in the B'liar years tend to compare unfavourably as do GCSEs versus 'O' Levels.

    This might help you understand it has pictures:

    http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171776_337841.pdf

    so assuming twice as many people in UKIP are over 40 then they are half as likely to have a degree as someone who could graduate in 2011 because the number of degrees gained doubled between 1992 & 2011.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    good weekend all

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Cretinwatch signing orf!

    <<<lillibullero theme >>>
    Last edited by sasguru; 14 March 2014, 17:21.

    Leave a comment:


  • mos
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Anyway judging from that exchange, there's at least one country whose educational level isn't better than the UK's: Poland.
    Maybe they made it better after mos left.
    Maybe

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by mos View Post
    But yes, UK is behind most in not all other EU countries in PISA ranking, which is a shame.
    That is surprising given that the germans have those awful dr oekter things. Waitrose ones are much better.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Anyway judging from that exchange, there's at least one country whose educational level isn't better than the UK's: Poland.
    Maybe they made it better after mos left.

    Leave a comment:


  • mos
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    I thought I was on your ignore list anyway
    I'm glad you realise you could learn something by tuning in.
    bored

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by mos View Post
    I am bored with you by the way.
    I thought I was on your ignore list anyway
    I'm glad you realise you could learn something by tuning in.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bunk
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • mos
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    The conclusion was not justified from the information given, was it?
    Hence it was illogical.
    .
    Earth to CretinGuru - New Labor was voted to Power in 1997. It is a common knowledge

    I am bored with you by the way.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by mos View Post
    Yes, I was supervising your sloppy job, you .
    Pathetic. You're so fooking thick you trotted out that figure without thinking that it gave a clue about what level you were at.
    I'm glad I was right in my judgement.

    Leave a comment:


  • mos
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    £300K tax over 15 years? That's 20K a year.
    And you're a "Tier 1" immigrant?
    Feck me, maybe UKIP have a point.
    What have you been doing, cleaning toilets?
    Yes, I was supervising your sloppy job, you .

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by mos View Post
    My hypothesis did not have logical flaw, you conceited moron.
    The conclusion was not justified from the information given, was it?
    Hence it was illogical.
    No wonder you've earned so little over the years.
    Keep digging though - it seems to be the "modus operandi" for cretins.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by mos View Post
    I have never claimed £1 in benefits and I am in BUPA since 2002. I cannot be bothered to calculate direct taxes which I contributed over the years but its far in excess of £300K.

    But yes, I am free to do everything I want as long as its within the law.
    £300K tax over 15 years? That's 20K a year.
    And you're a "Tier 1" immigrant?
    Feck me, maybe UKIP have a point.
    What have you been doing, cleaning toilets?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X