- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "What are the implications of HMRC press release?"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View PostHMRC want to defend their vested interests, their gold plated public sector pensions and their cushy arsewipe jobs living off other people's productive work
Leave a comment:
-
Well I thought this was what they do to risk-assess anyway? Thing is, there's still a good 100k PSCs that do take the more 'aggressive' approach she is referring to, so it narrows it down but not by much. Besides, might there not be other tax efficiency considerations that prevent one from drawing down more in dividends? One would expect them to try target cases with higher potential yield. I think this is all just to cobble up a distraction from the horrible cost-efficiency of IR35 with regard to its direct yields.Last edited by Zero Liability; 12 February 2014, 17:54.
Leave a comment:
-
What are the implications of HMRC press release?
Leave a comment:
-
Anyone who's paying themselves more than the minimum but < 50% might as well just pay the minimum.
Fill yer boots!
Leave a comment:
-
HMRC’s Robin Wythes thinks that without the rule [IR35], “most directors would simply pay themselves up to the primary threshold to protect their NI position and [then] take…virtually all of their [remaining] income” out as dividends.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by mickey View Post
Leave a comment:
-
What are the implications of HMRC press release?
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Yesterday 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
Leave a comment: