- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: safe standing at football matches
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "safe standing at football matches"
Collapse
-
I would hate to stand at a football match. At least in a seat I stand some chance of a kip.
-
Originally posted by vetran View Postif the number standing were strictly controlled and it was possible to make sure no one tried to force their way in as they did at Hillsborough (unfortunate fact that contributed even though the Police were negligent) then stands could be safe-ish.
However the provision of seats makes numbers easy to control and limit the effects of crowd surges.
Agree rails between seats or waist high seats (like theatres & cinemas) would make more sense than knee high seats in front.
If you control numbers coming in, and divide standing into smaller barriered blocks to mitigate surges, it's a lot safer.
How you control movement within the ground without specific seats to go to I'm not sure.
Leave a comment:
-
if the number standing were strictly controlled and it was possible to make sure no one tried to force their way in as they did at Hillsborough (unfortunate fact that contributed even though the Police were negligent) then stands could be safe-ish.
However the provision of seats makes numbers easy to control and limit the effects of crowd surges.
Agree rails between seats or waist high seats (like theatres & cinemas) would make more sense than knee high seats in front.
Leave a comment:
-
The problem with what happened at Hilsbourgh is not down to standing. It was down to bad policing and too many people trying to get into a confined area - an area only confined because of the fences due to the crowd problems that football had. I think standing should be allowed at every ground.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by The Central Scrutinizer View PostSteve Rotherham - Saw him on the tv this morning. He is vehemently opposed to standing at football grounds. The discussion was about the standing facilities (rail seats) being put in at Bristol City where the stands can be adjusted to cater for all seating or all standing. I can’t see where his objection is coming from. Standing at football games in Europe is standard in a lot of grounds. BBC Sport - Bristol City plan to install rail seats at Ashton Gate
It will NEVER happen in the PL though
Personally, I think with all the recent findings on the police in Hillsborough, it's the perfect time to discuss this. The fans have been exonerated and there are documented lessons to be learnt regarding policing, tickets and stadium design. Any debate should be sensitive and always aware of fans' safety, but it's such a different world since 1989. I just worry that emotional issues will dominate any sensible, sensitive debate and that certain opponents to the proposal can only ever bring to mind memories of crumbling terraces, bad policing, bad organisation, fences, instead of seeing what is really on offer.
And............... unfortunately that's exactly what it will become, and no-one will have the balls to say "we respect your opinion, but the world has moved on since 1989 and we need to look at it objectively". I can already see dickheads like that Adrian Durham on Talktulipe, banging on about how it's "disrespecting the memories of those who died".
The outcome of Hillsborough was undoubtedly contributed to by a number of factors - however the HFSG and people like Steve Rotherham want to have their cake and eat it, and direct all of their scorn upon whichever one of the elements suits the particular argument they're making that day.
Most of the crowd behind the goals at the Liverpool/Arsenal game were standing throughout the whole game and this goes on at the majority of PL grounds. He didn’t mention that though.
How many stood on the kop in the FIVE years between Hillsborough and them knocking it down?
What is almost always lost on opponents of safe standing is that the proposals aren’t for a return to terracing but the rail seats give you an allocated area, much in the same way seated grounds give you a row and seat number. That’s your area and it doesn’t mean that you’ll suddenly end up with 2 or 3 times the capacity of that area being breached.
To me, there’s no good reason why safe standing hasn’t already been introduced. It provides cheaper ticket prices to the individual, provides more revenue to clubs (18 standing places for every 10 seats) and is actually easier to police than a seated area. Unfortunately many laws, rules and regulations for football arenas are for a different type of supporter from a different era.
Leave a comment:
-
safe standing at football matches
Steve Rotherham - Saw him on the tv this morning. He is vehemently opposed to standing at football grounds. The discussion was about the standing facilities (rail seats) being put in at Bristol City where the stands can be adjusted to cater for all seating or all standing. I can’t see where his objection is coming from. Standing at football games in Europe is standard in a lot of grounds. BBC Sport - Bristol City plan to install rail seats at Ashton Gate
It will NEVER happen in the PL though
Personally, I think with all the recent findings on the police in Hillsborough, it's the perfect time to discuss this. The fans have been exonerated and there are documented lessons to be learnt regarding policing, tickets and stadium design. Any debate should be sensitive and always aware of fans' safety, but it's such a different world since 1989. I just worry that emotional issues will dominate any sensible, sensitive debate and that certain opponents to the proposal can only ever bring to mind memories of crumbling terraces, bad policing, bad organisation, fences, instead of seeing what is really on offer.
And............... unfortunately that's exactly what it will become, and no-one will have the balls to say "we respect your opinion, but the world has moved on since 1989 and we need to look at it objectively". I can already see dickheads like that Adrian Durham on Talktulipe, banging on about how it's "disrespecting the memories of those who died".
The outcome of Hillsborough was undoubtedly contributed to by a number of factors - however the HFSG and people like Steve Rotherham want to have their cake and eat it, and direct all of their scorn upon whichever one of the elements suits the particular argument they're making that day.
Most of the crowd behind the goals at the Liverpool/Arsenal game were standing throughout the whole game and this goes on at the majority of PL grounds. He didn’t mention that though.
How many stood on the kop in the FIVE years between Hillsborough and them knocking it down?Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Yesterday 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
Leave a comment: