- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Ken is innocent!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Ken is innocent!"
Collapse
-
From what I've heard of the DLT case it sounded like he did no more than the generally accepted behaviour of the period, a bit of a grope was perfectly normal.
-
Originally posted by vwdan View PostNo, because that's not how it works. Is there any evidence that they have lied, fabricated evidence or deliberately set out to deceive? (Hint: The defendant being found not-guilty doesn't imply this)Sounds a bit suspect to me.In court, the woman making the rape claims changed her mind about how old she was at the time.
Another woman initially told police she was warned about Mr Roache by actor Johnny Briggs, who played Mike Baldwin, but when it was discovered he was not in the show at the time she said the warning had come from a different actor.
BBC News - William Roache found not guilty of rape and indecent assault
Leave a comment:
-
No, because that's not how it works. Is there any evidence that they have lied, fabricated evidence or deliberately set out to deceive? (Hint: The defendant being found not-guilty doesn't imply this)Originally posted by suityou01 View PostRight to he was acquitted? Will the plaintiffs have to stand trial for perjury now?Last edited by vwdan; 6 February 2014, 12:27.
Leave a comment:
-
-
One out of 3 for Alf so far:
Personally I reckon there's no smoke without fireBig day yesterday for 'alleged celebrity nonce-watch'.
My forecast is..
Harris - down
Roache - innocent
DLT - down but only on the groping stuff
Leave a comment:
-
WTF are you talking about?
and where's the thumbs down button or are we only allowed to pat each other on the back these days?
Leave a comment:
-
Right to he was acquitted? Will the plaintiffs have to stand trial for perjury now?
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07



Leave a comment: