• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Own up, who broke the ATMs this time?"

Collapse

  • original PM
    replied
    Originally posted by CheeseSlice View Post
    Thats crazy. I should be able to walk into HSBC to withdraw whatever is in my account, and if asked why say I'm going to put the money in a suitcase and hide it under my bed. They shouldn't refuse to pay out 'my' own bloody money because I dont have good enough reason.

    Looks like they've now lifted this because of the backlash from customers:
    Statement on large cash withdrawals
    I had this when trying to complete on my house - had about 90k in my account - went to get it transfered and I started to get ooh we need the manager and ooh we cannot do that much

    had a quiet word with the manager along the lines of the fact it was my fookin money and not his and he needs to get it transfered....

    fookin clueless

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by CheeseSlice View Post
    BBC article about Lloyds has been updated:






    Nobody going to tell us what happened then?


    “That is why, when threatened by the global financial turmoil that started in India Scootland and has now spread across the world, we in Britain took action to secure the truth and make sure it didn't get out"

    Leave a comment:


  • Kanye
    replied
    I don't think I would hire "Alan Woodward, a cyber security specialist" if he thinks that backups bring down systems and doesn't account for two pieces of hardware going down at the same time on a system is critical as the ATM network.

    Leave a comment:


  • CheeseSlice
    replied
    BBC article about Lloyds has been updated:

    When the problems first arose, TSB chief Mr Pester tweeted: "My apologies to TSB customers having problems with their cards. I'm working hard with my team now to try to fix the problems," he said, and he also took to Twitter to respond directly to unhappy customers.

    He told the BBC two of the seven servers that process TSB debit card payments had suffered problems, which meant that about a quarter of TSB card transactions were affected.
    Prof Alan Woodward, a cyber security specialist at the University of Surrey, told the BBC: "It is quite unusual for two bits of hardware to fall over at the same time so I suspect it's something else that's happened.

    "Quiet times like Sundays are when they do things like maintenance, so they'll do software upgrades or they might be doing back-ups. And it's those sort of things that tend to go wrong. So I suspect something like that has affected two machines at once.


    "They might have been able to cope with one out of the cluster going down, but two is probably what's causing the problem."

    Nobody going to tell us what happened then?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    The reason banks and building socities do that is to stop older customers being ripped off my conmen doing work on their house.
    So asking for a quote fron a conman before cash is given would stop it?

    Either way it's not the job of banks to tell their clients what to spend THEIR money on.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    They should take care when ACCEPTING money, not when paying them out to already verified owner.

    It's none of the ****ing business what the rightful owner of the money want to spend their cash on - whoever ACCEPTS it as payment is responsible for any money laundering stuff.
    The reason banks and building socities do that is to stop older customers being ripped off my conmen doing work on their house.

    Unfortunately some of them forget that we aren't all OAPs.

    The last time a bank did that to me a complaint to head office got it sorted. The b*tch of a branch manager also disappeared a couple of months later.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    They are probably still smarting from this:

    BBC News - HSBC to pay $1.9bn in US money laundering penalties

    Don't forget to wipe the powder from your nose and if you look foreign try an English accent.
    They should take care when ACCEPTING money, not when paying them out to already verified owner.

    It's none of the ****ing business what the rightful owner of the money want to spend their cash on - whoever ACCEPTS it as payment is responsible for any money laundering stuff.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    They are probably still smarting from this:

    BBC News - HSBC to pay $1.9bn in US money laundering penalties

    Don't forget to wipe the powder from your nose and if you look foreign try an English accent.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by CheeseSlice View Post
    Thats crazy. I should be able to walk into HSBC to withdraw whatever is in my account, and if asked why say I'm going to put the money in a suitcase and hide it under my bed. They shouldn't refuse to pay out 'my' own bloody money because I dont have good enough reason.

    Looks like they've now lifted this because of the backlash from customers:
    Statement on large cash withdrawals
    I will use that one!

    Leave a comment:


  • Bunk
    replied
    Any truth to the rumour this originated in Jersey?

    Leave a comment:


  • KentPhilip
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    I'd be worried more about stuff like this -

    "When we presented them with the withdrawal slip, they declined to give us the money because we could not provide them with a satisfactory explanation for what the money was for. They wanted a letter from the person involved."

    BBC News - HSBC imposes restrictions on large cash withdrawals
    Just tell them you are planning to buy a second-hand car for cash, off Autotrader.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by CheeseSlice View Post
    Thats crazy.
    UK halts use of 'dirty' 500-euro notes - CNN.com

    Leave a comment:


  • CheeseSlice
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    I'd be worried more about stuff like this -

    "When we presented them with the withdrawal slip, they declined to give us the money because we could not provide them with a satisfactory explanation for what the money was for. They wanted a letter from the person involved."

    BBC News - HSBC imposes restrictions on large cash withdrawals
    Thats crazy. I should be able to walk into HSBC to withdraw whatever is in my account, and if asked why say I'm going to put the money in a suitcase and hide it under my bed. They shouldn't refuse to pay out 'my' own bloody money because I dont have good enough reason.

    Looks like they've now lifted this because of the backlash from customers:
    Statement on large cash withdrawals

    Leave a comment:


  • TestMangler
    replied
    Originally posted by CoolerKing View Post
    Tip of the iceberg!!

    some of the tulip code I witnessed offshoting putting thorough and testing signoff protocols were laughable.
    Are you looking at me ??

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    I'd be worried more about stuff like this -

    "When we presented them with the withdrawal slip, they declined to give us the money because we could not provide them with a satisfactory explanation for what the money was for. They wanted a letter from the person involved."

    BBC News - HSBC imposes restrictions on large cash withdrawals

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X