• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Scottish Politicians, are they worse than other politicians?"

Collapse

  • minestrone
    replied
    You lot will only see the more lucid and presentable ones.

    There are some absolute nutters floating about Scottish politics with crackpot ideas that have a disturbingly large support.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    Something that different from the same old blue versus red corrupt establishment.
    Like what? Pink vs Green?

    Leave a comment:


  • MicrosoftBob
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    What does "voting for change" actually mean? All these idiots who want "change" have little idea of what "change" means
    They don't know that they really want to swap being ruled by english civil servants to dutch civil servants

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    What does "voting for change" actually mean? All these idiots who want "change" have little idea of what "change" means
    Something that different from the same old blue versus red corrupt establishment.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    Not sure I care to hear what politicians have to say these days.

    The people that live in the north don't vote or think like the people in the south. This opportunity to vote for change is an opportunity for the residents and not for politicians.
    What does "voting for change" actually mean? All these idiots who want "change" have little idea of what "change" means

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by Flashman View Post
    Usually? Presumably your in favour when you think the people might vote the 'right' way?
    No; I'm in favour of representative democracy, not 'direct democracy'. I would be in favour of people electing representatives to a seperate negotiating body if necessary in this case, but I'm not some kind of anti-democratic type who wants to manipulate things such that people can't vote against what I want. Far from it; I want the democratic process to lead to solutions that most people can live with, not just a new set of equally bad problems that shift problems to a different set of victims than the last lot of problems.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flashman
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    But it's not an opportunity; it's a binary choice that excludes all compromise or all moderate solutions that are somewhere in between. Independence, yes or no, that's the only choice. I'm sure there are lots of Scots residents who would actually like to say 'umm, er...hmm...well I'm not entirely happy with the current arrangements but how about sitting down and negotiating new arrangements for the future?'

    That's why I am usually opposed to referenda.
    Usually? Presumably your in favour when you think the people might vote the 'right' way?

    I think the Scottish referendum is a good thing if it finally means the Scots will actually put up or shut up. No more devolution or negotiations. If the Scots stay then no more freebies like free prescription and free university tuition.


    Of course this won't happen our awfully nice PM Cameron will bribe them with even more handouts

    Another 300 years of moaning coming up......

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    But it's not an opportunity; it's a binary choice that excludes all compromise or all moderate solutions that are somewhere in between. Independence, yes or no, that's the only choice. I'm sure there are lots of Scots residents who would actually like to say 'umm, er...hmm...well I'm not entirely happy with the current arrangements but how about sitting down and negotiating new arrangements for the future?'
    Which is exactly why Cameron has done it like that.

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View Post
    FTFY
    You already have had a vote on the referendum for the last 300 years.

    Leave a comment:


  • MicrosoftBob
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    I'm fairly certain were it a question of financial independence, whatever the outcome, the yes vote would be in the bag if English voters could vote on Scottish independence.
    FTFY

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    But it's not an opportunity; it's a binary choice that excludes all compromise or all moderate solutions that are somewhere in between. Independence, yes or no, that's the only choice. I'm sure there are lots of Scots residents who would actually like to say 'umm, er...hmm...well I'm not entirely happy with the current arrangements but how about sitting down and negotiating new arrangements for the future?'

    That's why I am usually opposed to referenda.
    Ich auch.

    However I don't see this binary choice. Assuming a no vote wins. I think it'll make a big difference to the choices made for Scotland if 30% vote no instead of 60%. You just cannot ignore the wishes of that many people despite the result.

    I'm fairly certain were it a question of financial independence, whatever the outcome, the yes vote would be in the bag.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    Not sure I care to hear what politicians have to say these days.

    The people that live in the north don't vote or think like the people in the south. This opportunity to vote for change is an opportunity for the residents and not for politicians.
    But it's not an opportunity; it's a binary choice that excludes all compromise or all moderate solutions that are somewhere in between. Independence, yes or no, that's the only choice. I'm sure there are lots of Scots residents who would actually like to say 'umm, er...hmm...well I'm not entirely happy with the current arrangements but how about sitting down and negotiating new arrangements for the future?'

    That's why I am usually opposed to referenda.

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Not sure I care to hear what politicians have to say these days.

    The people that live in the north don't vote or think like the people in the south. This opportunity to vote for change is an opportunity for the residents and not for politicians.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by Platypus View Post
    Question Time last night.

    Even if the people of Scotland don't want independence, can their rabid politicians have it please? They still live in a world where everything is Thatcher's fault and everyone is entitled to everything free.

    Sheesh.

    Well, more like actually
    See Darmstadt's thread about misinformation about the EU. Same old thing; nationalists peddling what their chosen market segment want to hear.

    Leave a comment:


  • Platypus
    replied
    Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View Post
    So presumably everything will then be the EUs fault if they get independence
    No, it'll be the mess they inherited from the Tories / English* after 5 / 307 * years of mis-rule



    * Delete as appropriate

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X