• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "UK unemployment rate drops to 7.1%"

Collapse

  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    It was over one million two years ago.

    So a greater than 5% drop.
    You see thats a weird thing, one set of figures say that 2 years ago it was over a million, another says that its now at its highest and yet another says its gone down by 0.1%. What this says to me, is that everyone makes these things up as they go along so who can you trust?

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    It may have gone down but the youth unemployment figures are at their highest since 1993 with nearly 950,000 unemployed and over 200,000 of those for more than a year.
    It was over one million two years ago.

    So a greater than 5% drop.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    too many UK manufacturing companies are nothing of the sort but but foreign own entities exporting as many profits as they're exports
    That annoys me too. Between them, our unions with their strikes and Thatcher with her privatisations of effective organisations like the CEGB, buggered too much of our industry and left us without the expertise to do a lot of things, like build our own power stations or major railway lines. There have been some idiotic decisions of this government too, like handing a rail contract to a foreign company instead of one of ours to save a rather small amount. Provided we are not propping up inefficient companies with taxpayers' money I would like to see more protectionism. The French always did have more sense in that way.

    No reason to be too pessimistic about the UK. Many small UK companies have started trading overseas. We may have at last grasped that we can never compete with third world countries on price of basic goods and started doing what we should be doing, concentrating on innovation and luxury products. Also, things elsewhere do not stay the same. China is become less competitive as living standards rise and the population ages. The Lancashire textile industry is growing again as in this link:

    The company's business has grown 50% year-on-year since splitting production between Lancashire and China and it now has an annual turnover of around £20m - but it is now the UK side which is proving more productive.

    "Due to inflation and rising labour costs in China, and exchange rate differences with the yuan, the Chinese plant is becoming less competitive than the British manufacturing plant," says Mr Caldeira.

    "It is as cost-effective to make them here, so at the moment we're losing capacity in China, and gaining it here."

    Mr Caldeira thinks that it is not only his company which is fighting the long-term trend of British manufacturers losing out to cheaper, emerging economies.

    "The tide is starting to turn. There is a rebalancing that's starting," he said.

    "Chinese costs are rising faster than British costs, so anyone who is fending off competition from the Far East is finding that it's getting easier."
    BBC News - Lancashire leads new British textile manufacturing revival
    Last edited by xoggoth; 22 January 2014, 20:38.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flashman
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    It may have gone down but the youth unemployment figures are at their highest since 1993 with nearly 950,000 unemployed and over 200,000 of those for more than a year.
    Well they better just get used to being unemployed. Why bother hiring them when you can get a graduate from Bulgaria for £6.50 an hour?

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    It may have gone down but the youth unemployment figures are at their highest since 1993 with nearly 950,000 unemployed and over 200,000 of those for more than a year.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zero Liability
    replied
    Originally posted by SpontaneousOrder View Post
    When did they start high? The price of houses over the last 30 years have increased by at least double the increase in M2 money supply.
    One thing I wonder is whether these figures are massaged in the same way as the US ones are, i.e. improvements due to those who become long-term 'discouraged' from looking for work completely falling out of the labour force, pushing the numbers up favourably. It's also interesting to look at the composition of jobs, e.g. shifts from full time to part time/zero hour contracts etc, sectors that are driving the fall in unemployment (as the OP did; none of the ones at the top are particularly promising) and so on. The aggregate figure is very useful for concealing an economy that may still be under-performing in significant ways.

    Even a pick up in manufacturing activity and the PMI isn't necessarily a good sign if the activity is driven by an ultra-low interest rate environment and other forms of inflationary finance (on a global scale, as inevitably this will seep into the UK as well.)
    Last edited by Zero Liability; 22 January 2014, 19:34.

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    Don't disagree that this recovery is too much about the people spending more but there are improvement in our manufacturing sector:

    Growth in new manufacturing orders was the strongest since April 2011, according to the latest CBI quarterly Industrial Trends Survey | Western Morning News

    However anyone who thinks it would be better under Labour, with Ed "we need to invest in the public sector" Balls as chancellor is seriously deluded. If they think socialist policies are good for an economy maybe they should go to France, oh no maybe not.
    I might share those sentiments were it not for the thought in the back of my mind that too many UK manufacturing companies are nothing of the sort but but foreign own entities exporting as many profits as they're exports.

    We might mock France, but consider it's a French company propping the manufacturing Fracking effort in the north.
    Last edited by scooterscot; 22 January 2014, 22:07.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Flashman View Post
    So it would be better if unemployment went up?
    Yes, if it was MPs who became unemployed.

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by Flashman View Post
    Anyone who thinks anything much will change after the election is seriously deluded. Different faces. Same Government.
    Exactly. Whoever you vote for the Government always gets in!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Flashman
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    Don't disagree that this recovery is too much about the people spending more but there are improvement in our manufacturing sector:

    Growth in new manufacturing orders was the strongest since April 2011, according to the latest CBI quarterly Industrial Trends Survey | Western Morning News

    However anyone who thinks it would be better under Labour, with Ed "we need to invest in the public sector" Balls as chancellor is seriously deluded. If they think socialist policies are good for an economy maybe they should go to France, oh no maybe not.
    Anyone who thinks anything much will change after the election is seriously deluded. Different faces. Same Government.

    Leave a comment:


  • SpontaneousOrder
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    This is not a success story.
    Don't disagree that this recovery is too much about the people spending more but there are improvement in our manufacturing sector:

    Growth in new manufacturing orders was the strongest since April 2011, according to the latest CBI quarterly Industrial Trends Survey | Western Morning News

    However anyone who thinks it would be better under Labour, with Ed "we need to invest in the public sector" Balls as chancellor is seriously deluded. If they think socialist policies are good for an economy maybe they should go to France, oh no maybe not.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flashman
    replied
    Originally posted by suityou01 View Post
    Cowabunga dude.

    It must be election time soon.
    yup 18 months to fill the war chest with dosh before the bubble bursts. Said Chancellor Osborne.

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by Flashman View Post
    Ride that wave!
    Cowabunga dude.

    It must be election time soon.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flashman
    replied
    Originally posted by suityou01 View Post
    Not really. Once unemployment goes below 7% they stop QE and put the base rate up. Good for savers. Then hyper inflation and another bust cycle. Simples.
    Ride that wave!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X