- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Judge Dredd
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Judge Dredd"
Collapse
-
I (and many residents of the estate) feed birds in their own place - pool. Ducks, geese and moorhens are much nicer Godly creatures than pigeons.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by AtW
Case in point - lots of yobs and just young kids without anything to do gets around one place where I and other people feed ducks and geese as well as enjoy ambient sounds of silence. They group around and smoke, drink beer a bit etc.
Sounds like twenty years in the juve cubes to me, citizen.
And five years for ATW for anti-social bird feeding!Originally posted by Dalek SupremeSounds like twenty years in the juve cubes to me, citizen.
..."The city council successfully applied for an interim order in May banning
Mr Branfield from feeding the birds outside his rented house.
He was hauled before Bristol Family Court again on Friday, where he was given a full Asbo, which will run indefinitely.
Mr Branfield now faces up to five years in prison if he breaches the order by feeding pigeons and any other animals"
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article...293348,00.html
Leave a comment:
-
Sounds like twenty years in the juve cubes to me, citizen.Originally posted by AtWCase in point - lots of yobs and just young kids without anything to do gets around one place where I and other people feed ducks and geese as well as enjoy ambient sounds of silence. They group around and smoke, drink beer a bit etc.
Leave a comment:
-
Fine - its a risk, if mistake is made then person gets compensated, say double worth of the car: this means that in unlikely even of an error you will get far more than you had, sounds like a nice balance.Originally posted by ASBThe database of insurance policys is though to be 11% inaccurate.
But I agree with you in principle - ASBO, instant fines and this are all ways to workaround normal system of due process. However such due process is very expensive for minor cases, so you have only these options:
1) use ASBOs to make further offending much more serious crime for which they get punished
2) greatly increase costs or punishments for such trials - right now such costs are laughable
3) leave things as is
Leave a comment:
-
Tweek was my favourite...Originally posted by Board Game GeekBeen collecting since Prog 1 :-)
Or was it Judge Hershey?
Leave a comment:
-
Quite a lot springs to mind.Originally posted by AtWSay what's wrong with this:
"The ability for police to seize and crush cars driven by those repeatedly driving without registration or insurance, no driving licence or MOT. Instant driving bans could also be imposed ahead of a court appearance"
You may believe that it is fair and proper to penalise someone based on hearsay but until judged by peers (which is what our system demands) they are nothing other than allegations.
To look at your specific example, [I can already hear your rebuttal
] .
The database of insurance policys is though to be 11% inaccurate. It also doesn't cover somebody driving validly on somebody else policys. The DVLA databases are not entirely accurate - but are pretty good. There are still a moderate number of vehicles and licences that are not recorded there apparently. The MOT database is a joke.
The information available to the police at the point of conflict is nothing more conclusive than a probability. It is certainly in no way definitive.
Now, if you want to change the law that mandates you must always have evidence of entitlement when in a car otherwise we will take it away and crush it then fair enough - but that is a very different thing.
<soapbox>There is an increasing tendency to use an ASBO or similar legislation to allow the authorities to crimilise anybody at will. Simply on the basis of "well there is nothing illegal but we don't like it". Increasing these powers will do no more than turn chief constables into judge, jury and executioner. If ACPO do get their way we have transitted completely into a stalinist dictatorship.</soapbox>
Leave a comment:
-
Splundig vor thrig!!!Originally posted by djfootHoly crud! (Only true 2000AD fans may respond...)
Eat Judge boot punk. I AM the law!
Leave a comment:
-
Sounds reasonable so long as its possible (which of course will be possible) to challenge such decisions in court. Case in point - lots of yobs and just young kids without anything to do gets around one place where I and other people feed ducks and geese as well as enjoy ambient sounds of silence. They group around and smoke, drink beer a bit etc. These kids should be in the library or in some sporting facility, not annoy residents.
Say what's wrong with this:
"The ability for police to seize and crush cars driven by those repeatedly driving without registration or insurance, no driving licence or MOT. Instant driving bans could also be imposed ahead of a court appearance"
I am no perfect driver, but I've got insurance, MOT, driving license and will never drive drunk or high on drugs. Some of those yobs drive F-reg cars at ridiculous speed, clearly modded cars too and I bet they did not declare that on their insurance.
Leave a comment:
-
IT contractor caught red handed with IR35 friendly contract in his pocket.
Leave a comment:
-
Judge Dredd
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4793117.stm
Police are considering asking ministers for more powers to impose "instant justice" for anti-social activities.
The Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo) may push for more powers to penalise people without a court appearance.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36

Leave a comment: