Originally posted by AtW
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Merge in Turn - What do the panel think?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Merge in Turn - What do the panel think?"
Collapse
-
-
e) - post a thread on cuk with a poll and abide by the majority verdict.
Which will probably be "AndyW's mum always merges her lovers in turn".
Leave a comment:
-
**** it, I'm going to buy a battered old Hilux now as I hate these ****ers who don't follow the common rules of the road. For this situation you follow the zipper effect but no, there's always those ******* who don't, or won't...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by RedSauce View PostIf there are no witnesses then it is your word against hers and as you were the one making the manoevre it is likely the insurers will rule against you (50:50 at best)
Not all that concerned anyway as it is a Company vehicle and the minor scratches are no worse than have been routinely acquired over the last 3.5 years of off-road working etc. anyway.
Time will tell I suppose....
Hope she had a whopping excess though!!!
Leave a comment:
-
If there are no witnesses then it is your word against hers and as you were the one making the manoevre it is likely the insurers will rule against you (50:50 at best)
Leave a comment:
-
I only do that when the idiot on the outside watches us all obediently alternate before the final narrowing then rushes down the outside to get to the front.
Leave a comment:
-
B for me. There are 2 of these this near my house and i am more than willing to go into the side of the impatient driver.
The other one that gets me is people undertaking. I am quite a cautious driver and leave the correct space between myself and the car in front on motorways, there is always some tw*t who likes to overtake, so once i see them start the manoeuvre I accelerate so they can't get in front, then slowly close the gap between me and the car behind so they are actually further back than before.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by shaunbhoy View PostInteresting stuff. FWIW, I plumped for option b which ultimately morphed into option c.
Minimal damage to the rear passenger-side wheel arch of my Hilux, but considerably more to the front driver side wing of her Fiesta.
I believe she may be a little more receptive to the notion of merging in turn next time she negotiates that particular junction.
Leave a comment:
-
Interesting stuff. FWIW, I plumped for option b which ultimately morphed into option c.
Minimal damage to the rear passenger-side wheel arch of my Hilux, but considerably more to the front driver side wing of her Fiesta.
I believe she may be a little more receptive to the notion of merging in turn next time she negotiates that particular junction.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Today 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
- Why limited company working could be back in vogue in 2025 Dec 16 09:45
Leave a comment: