• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "The end of the world as we know it?"

Collapse

  • aardvark
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Is it related to the Calibi-Yau space?
    Second cousins twice removed.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Is it related to the Calibi-Yau space?

    Leave a comment:


  • hyperD
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    Darn - I can't view videos at cliento, as they are paranoid about security.
    Not sure if I'm supposed to post them either! Especially from the late great George. This was at the end of one of his stints where he took the piss out of chicken-licken readin', eco-loons like our very own resident CAGW troll clarkey

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Darn - I can't view videos at cliento, as they are paranoid about security.

    Leave a comment:


  • hyperD
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    AIUI it's a more convenient (than Feynman diagrams) way of calculating scattering amplitudes, i.e. given a set of interacting particles and fields, predicting the relative probabilities of certain output particles and (?) their directions.

    But I believe it is all currently predicated on something called supersymmetry, which hasn't yet actually been observed. Much as physicists want this to exist, their hopes are looking increasingly forlorn, and more and more physicists are skeptical that it's any more than an elegant fiction.

    There was a paper on it last week in the ArXiv: The Amplituhedron

    Is it me, or would a better name have been either amplihedron or even amplitudahedron? The name they chose, "amplituhedron", seems a bit jarring and neither fish nor fowl, as if J J Thomson had dubbed the electron the electricaltron

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by aardvark View Post
    Scientists Discover a Jewel at the Heart of Quantum Physics - Wired Science

    "Our understanding of the universe is about to be blown wide open and we are on the brink of a new era."

    I don't understand any of it, but the picture's pretty.
    AIUI it's a more convenient (than Feynman diagrams) way of calculating scattering amplitudes, i.e. given a set of interacting particles and fields, predicting the relative probabilities of certain output particles and (?) their directions.

    But I believe it is all currently predicated on something called supersymmetry, which hasn't yet actually been observed. Much as physicists want this to exist, their hopes are looking increasingly forlorn, and more and more physicists are skeptical that it's any more than an elegant fiction.

    There was a paper on it last week in the ArXiv: The Amplituhedron

    Is it me, or would a better name have been either amplihedron or even amplitudahedron? The name they chose, "amplituhedron", seems a bit jarring and neither fish nor fowl, as if J J Thomson had dubbed the electron the electricaltron

    Leave a comment:


  • Ticktock
    replied
    Originally posted by MyUserName View Post
    Are you saying that MF is the centre of the universe?!
    He certainly thinks he is.

    Leave a comment:


  • MyUserName
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    Just as I always thought. At the centre of everything is a translucent blob.
    Are you saying that MF is the centre of the universe?!

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Just as I always thought. At the centre of everything is a translucent blob.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Makes me think of 'wholeness and the implicate order' and my own made up metaphysics. Would be awesome if they prove me right

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
    This is nonsense. Everyone knows that the universe is made up of Pixie dust.
    Is this related to the elves in hyperspace?

    http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine_elf
    Last edited by Old Greg; 18 December 2013, 08:46.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    This is nonsense. Everyone knows that the universe is made up of Pixie dust.

    Leave a comment:


  • aardvark
    started a topic The end of the world as we know it?

    The end of the world as we know it?

    Scientists Discover a Jewel at the Heart of Quantum Physics - Wired Science

    "Our understanding of the universe is about to be blown wide open and we are on the brink of a new era."

    I don't understand any of it, but the picture's pretty.

Working...
X