Originally posted by ASB
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Hmm - let them eat "Extra Special"
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Hmm - let them eat "Extra Special""
Collapse
-
In terms of your final para.Originally posted by Bellona View PostJust been a segment about this on the OneShow.
There was controversy over the fact that lucky recipients had to be in receipt of benefits to qualify, when the current stats show that the working poor are growing in number, and the Salvation Army demand for food parcels has seen a huge increase.
I am in favour in principle - but deciding eligibility for the "deserving of help" should not necessarily be benefits driven : plenty of pensioners barely eating and working families too proud/ineligible for benefits surviving on a pittance.
I need hospital treatment for 3 days every month. Its as a day case. My hotel is paid for by the nhs but my transport isnt. Now I can happily afford the 200 quid trai ticket to get to london. Have to travel in peak hours. But for a lot of folk that wod be a big expense.
Help is available to those on benefits. But nowt to those on, for example, average or low wages.
Benefit receipt is not a good criteria for eligibilty for help. Some sort of affordibility test would be better in my view.
All typos copyright.
Leave a comment:
-
Just been a segment about this on the OneShow.
There was controversy over the fact that lucky recipients had to be in receipt of benefits to qualify, when the current stats show that the working poor are growing in number, and the Salvation Army demand for food parcels has seen a huge increase.
I am in favour in principle - but deciding eligibility for the "deserving of help" should not necessarily be benefits driven : plenty of pensioners barely eating and working families too proud/ineligible for benefits surviving on a pittance.
Leave a comment:
-
"Shelves at the discount store are stocked daily with residual food not needed by large supermarket chains, because it might have damaged packaging or the wrong labelling. All the produce is within its sell-by date.Originally posted by vetran View PostGood idea?
The new enterprise, overseen by food re-distributor Company Shop, is being supported by major retailers, brands and manufacturers, including Asda, Morrisons, The Co-operative Food, Marks & Spencer, Tesco, Mondelez, Ocado, Tetley, Young's and Muller."
Leave a comment:
-
Hmm - let them eat "Extra Special"
Community Shop 'social supermarket' opens with goods 70% cheaper than Tesco or Asda | Mail Online
Revolutionary 'social supermarket' opens with branded goods 70% cheaper than the likes of Tesco and Asda... but only people on benefits can shop there
New Community Shop, the first of its kind, opens in Goldthorpe, Barnsley, South Yorkshire
Food reduced by as much as two thirds for shoppers struggling with poverty and on benefits
Customers have to prove they are on benefits to take advantage of the rock-bottom prices
Only 500 people can become members of the shop and access discounts, as well as help and support
Project is backed by major retailers including Asda, Tesco, The Co-Op and M&SGood idea?Shelves at the discount store are stocked daily with residual food not needed by large supermarket chains, because it might have damaged packaging or the wrong labelling. All the produce is within its sell-by date.
The new enterprise, overseen by food re-distributor Company Shop, is being supported by major retailers, brands and manufacturers, including Asda, Morrisons, The Co-operative Food, Marks & Spencer, Tesco, Mondelez, Ocado, Tetley, Young's and Muller.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Today 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02

Leave a comment: