• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Chico was right. God is matematically proven"

Collapse

  • bogeyman
    replied
    Originally posted by Jabberwocky
    Errr Whanker.
    Online Jabberwocky simulator can be found here...

    http://www.rathergood.com/touretteaphone/

    Almost as offensive as the real thing.

    Leave a comment:


  • bogeyman
    replied
    Originally posted by Statistician
    What is matematics?
    Dunno, but it sounds like one of those online dating agencies.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fungus
    replied
    Originally posted by Jabberwocky
    Are you one of those cockney chaps ? All cock and no balls ?
    No but you are a cock and you talk balls.

    Leave a comment:


  • Statistician
    replied
    Originally posted by Francko
    Chico was right. God is matematically proven
    What is matematics?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Do you have TS or not?

    Leave a comment:


  • Jabberwocky
    replied
    Errr Whanker.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill
    Sense of humour required for AtW.
    You mean he was joking?

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW
    "Tourette Syndrome (TS) is a neurological disorder characterized by tics -- involuntary, rapid, sudden movements or vocalizations that occur repeatedly in the same way. "

    This (if true) should not be affect your judgement that can be inferred from your posts on this board.

    While I am sympathetic to anyone suffering from any illness (apart from self-inflicted) it should not be a blank cheque for saying or doing anything: if you can't handle responses on this board then don't post.
    Sense of humour required for AtW.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    "Tourette Syndrome (TS) is a neurological disorder characterized by tics -- involuntary, rapid, sudden movements or vocalizations that occur repeatedly in the same way. "

    This (if true) should not be affect your judgement that can be inferred from your posts on this board.

    While I am sympathetic to anyone suffering from any illness (apart from self-inflicted) it should not be a blank cheque for saying or doing anything: if you can't handle responses on this board then don't post.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jabberwocky
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW
    But I do - "retard" is a medical term, not name calling
    Actually I suffer from tourette syndrome, whanker. I have suffered from this affliction all my life, whanker. I find your lack of understanding contemptible, complete whanker.

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    In the Greek mindset Zeus and co. came after the other gods, such as Gaea etc. Zeus himself was the son of Cronus who was the son of Uranus who was the son of Gaea, and also her husband... Also there is much more of the "scratch my back I'll scratch yours" mentality. i.e. if you give a sacrifice to a god, then you expect something in return and as each god had multiple uses you'd give a sacrifice to the usefulness required. So if you wanted rain you'd sacrifice to the rain from zeus, if you were making a contract you'd scarifice to the keeper of oaths zeus, quite often in different places.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth
    Romans/Greeks believed.
    I much prefer those Gods - for starters when you make sacrifice to them you just give them bones and keep the meet, thanks to Prometeus. Plus these Gods are much more like human - Zeus shags eathly women and this allows him to be kept in touch. IMO all Gods that came after these are much more opressive and pocessive.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    Who says that if god is real he must be benign? Maybe he's a right bastard like most gods apart from the Christian one. Or maybe there are lots of gods like the Romans/Greeks believed. Much more in keeping with the CUK free market philosophy, the single all powerful god sounds like socialism to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Good and Bad are relative things, say Chico's favourite humanist Hitler had different view on those things than most people.

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    Originally posted by Francko
    Shouldn't you give the good example when trying to teach?
    Here is a good counter example to one of the axioms: basically one of the axioms state that the opposite of a good thing is a bad thing. So if you can find a good thing and it's opposite is also a good thing then the axiom is flawed.

    A good thing: Mountains are high. It's opposite: Valleys are low.

    But you can also say:

    A good thing: Valleys are low. It's opposite: Mountains are high.

    QED

    HTH

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X