• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Benefit scroungers more likely to smoke - Wail = haters"

Collapse

  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
    Saw a couple in their car both light up, with two kids in the back. Was quite shocked, whereas 25 years ago it was the norm.
    Indeed a friend of mine does that, horrifies me every time.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
    The ONS has been spouting quite a bit of crap lately - perhaps they are worried they might get canned.
    what incorrect data or looking at data in a way you don't agree with?

    I did rather think this was in the 'demonising the unemployed' vein.

    But I suspect the data is moderately accurate. It does show the work needs to be done with a subset of the population.

    Don't get me wrong I'm in favour of the smoking ban mainly, I would have just done it in two phases to let the pubs etc adjust. I was expecting a large fall in smoking after it though because it was a great catalyst.

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    Originally posted by Wanderer View Post
    One thing I do see is that fewer and fewer children are starting smoking and that's a positive thing.

    I also think the smoking ban has had a huge impact on peoples attitudes. Many people who used to smoke in their houses (and think it was acceptable to smoke in my house) are now going outside to smoke. The ban has caused a huge change it people's attitudes to what's acceptable and what's not.

    Also, I think these new electronic cigarettes are going to make a huge impact in the next few years. A lot of smokers I know have switched and don't smoke tobacco any more.
    Saw a couple in their car both light up, with two kids in the back. Was quite shocked, whereas 25 years ago it was the norm.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wanderer
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    The smoking ban doesn't seem to have changed the downward trend?
    One thing I do see is that fewer and fewer children are starting smoking and that's a positive thing.

    I also think the smoking ban has had a huge impact on peoples attitudes. Many people who used to smoke in their houses (and think it was acceptable to smoke in my house) are now going outside to smoke. The ban has caused a huge change it people's attitudes to what's acceptable and what's not.

    Also, I think these new electronic cigarettes are going to make a huge impact in the next few years. A lot of smokers I know have switched and don't smoke tobacco any more.

    Leave a comment:


  • amcdonald
    replied
    It needs a politician with guts to just ban it outright

    Smoking is more addictive than a lot of banned drugs, and just as harmfull

    Leave a comment:


  • Peoplesoft bloke
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    it was actually reporting ONS statistics. There was really very little opinion in the reporting.

    The thing I found interesting was the correlation between responsible job , marriage and not smoking. Plus the massive improvements in a decade.
    They rarely offer an "opinion" they just report selectively and stand back - have a look at the comments.

    The ONS has been spouting quite a bit of crap lately - perhaps they are worried they might get canned.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
    Would have thought the Wail would be promoting smoking for people it doesn't like as a way of getting rid of 'em.
    it was actually reporting ONS statistics. There was really very little opinion in the reporting.

    The thing I found interesting was the correlation between responsible job , marriage and not smoking. Plus the massive improvements in a decade.

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
    Well as smoking is banned in the workplace you're less likely to spend all day puffing. It's common sense really.

    I bet unemployed people have more sex / kids as well.

    I bet unemployed people watch more TV and use more electricity. Yada yada.
    Are you saying Suity is fibbing about all his contracts?

    Leave a comment:


  • fullyautomatix
    replied
    Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
    Would have thought the Wail would be promoting smoking for people it doesn't like as a way of getting rid of 'em.

    Erm mo, thats not a good idea to get rid of them, they wont die easily and clog up the NHS and then "we" have to spend millions trying to help them survive.

    Leave a comment:


  • Peoplesoft bloke
    replied
    Would have thought the Wail would be promoting smoking for people it doesn't like as a way of getting rid of 'em.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
    Given the extra leisure time, they're also more likely to exercise, keep their houses and gardens nice, and do volunteer work.

    Now you're just being silly.

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
    Well as smoking is banned in the workplace you're less likely to spend all day puffing. It's common sense really.

    I bet unemployed people have more sex / kids as well.

    I bet unemployed people watch more TV and use more electricity. Yada yada.
    Given the extra leisure time, they're also more likely to exercise, keep their houses and gardens nice, and do volunteer work.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Well as smoking is banned in the workplace you're less likely to spend all day puffing. It's common sense really.

    I bet unemployed people have more sex / kids as well.

    I bet unemployed people watch more TV and use more electricity. Yada yada.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    started a topic Benefit scroungers more likely to smoke - Wail = haters

    Benefit scroungers more likely to smoke - Wail = haters

    Unemployed TWICE as likely to smoke as those in work as figures show smoking ban has done little to persuade people to give up | Mail Online

    http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/ghs/op...classification

    ONS link for Wail haters. Better graphs on Wail.

    Now that is interesting, are smokers less likely to be achievers nowadays?

    The smoking ban doesn't seem to have changed the downward trend?

    Does a ring on your finger make you an ex smoker?

Working...
X