- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: British Gas Homecare
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "British Gas Homecare"
Collapse
-
On a related note how many here are having to get the new "Property Licenses" they've been going on about recently?
-
Originally posted by MailmanI was really surprised that this country doesnt have anything like a tenancy tribunal who holds deposits. Then I thought about it a bit more and realised that there is nothing in this country that surprises me
Mailman
new laws comping in soon say a 3rd party have to hold the deposit, or the landlord has to have an insurance setup for the deposit, this is a pain in the backside because I now have to think about doing this for my rental property....arse!
Leave a comment:
-
Yes this is true, but sueing them in small claims court is a no brainer - my last landlord gave 100% of deposit back, they were big company though but if it was small then I would not hesitate to sue: judges don't take it lightly when landlords take deposit like that - the burden of prove will fall on the landlord and this means receipts etc.Originally posted by mcquiggdMost landlords seem to see the Deposit as a means to offset any little expenses they may incur during a tenancy.
Not sure but I think heater maintenance, oven and possibly electric stuff in shower (if there is one) are responsibility of the landlord by law, probably from safety point of view.
Leave a comment:
-
I was really surprised that this country doesnt have anything like a tenancy tribunal who holds deposits. Then I thought about it a bit more and realised that there is nothing in this country that surprises meOriginally posted by mcquiggdMost landlords seem to see the Deposit as a means to offset any little expenses they may incur during a tenancy.
Would have to agree with you here. Only problem is when your bond is 2 months rentThe common approach amongst friends seems to be to not pay the last months rent, so as to minimise the amount they can be ripped off for.
Mailman
Leave a comment:
-
Most landlords seem to see the Deposit as a means to offset any little expenses they may incur during a tenancy.
When I move in / out of a flat, I now take pics of the place on my digital camera in case the agency suddenly sends me a bill for 'professional cleaning' or tries to deduct it from the Deposit.
The common approach amongst friends seems to be to not pay the last months rent, so as to minimise the amount they can be ripped off for.
Leave a comment:
-
It depends on the sort of tenancy. It is theoretically possible that the landlord could insist on maintenance from the tenants.Originally posted by AtW [blandlords responsibility[/b]
However under an ast it is the landlords responsibility to provide heating so it would be pointless to try and pass the maintenance on to the tenant. The same is not true of the shower though.
I agree that in practice it would be very unusual to find the responsibility shifted to the tenant though.
Leave a comment:
-
I rented that house for 3 years. Boiler failed twice and shower had to have electric heater replaced completely. I did not have insurance of any kind, however since its the landlords responsibility they paid for professionals to do the job quickly without me having to pay a dime in anything apart from very reasonable rent.
Leave a comment:
-
I've got the Npower version (even though i'm not with them) and took it out after I had problems with my boiler. They don't come around to inspect but there is a 14 day delay before cover starts. Since it was an intermittent fault I could handle that!
Seems good so far as I have had some new parts fitted and two visits.
Leave a comment:
-
I took it up and then cancelled it after a year and a bit. Why? The annual inspection was just a guy coming in and having a look at the boiler and then leaving after a minute.Originally posted by MarillionFanAnyone taken it up? If so Pros and Cons please.
And everytime we had any problems associated with the heating system, everything lead to a PowerFlush being required, which, of course, was not covered. At £600 it was a bit steep so I did it myself.
And we had some flooding outside. Apparantly, sump aways are not covered either.
If you're one of these people that buys extended guarantees for "piece of mind" then get one - it helps to keep the cost of the service down.
Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment:
-
No.
Pros - If something goes wrong, they fix it allegedly.
Cons - It costs you money whether something goes wrong or not.
Where the difficulty MF?
Right, with an attitude like that, step outside the forum now.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Today 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Yesterday 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31

Leave a comment: