Originally posted by vetran
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Book him Danno - Speeding Thread
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Book him Danno - Speeding Thread"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by dogzilla View PostClocked doing 95mph in Denmark less than a mile away from the German border.
Driven to the cash point and had 450 euros forcible extracted.
He was a nice chap though.Originally posted by doodab View PostYou were robbed. I got done in France, 120mph, €90. He was very disappointed when I turned out not to be German like the car.
Leave a comment:
-
I was caught doing 105 in a 70, made out I had a bad stomach and the officer let me go. Few of my mates have done the same thing
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dogzilla View PostClocked doing 95mph in Denmark less than a mile away from the German border.
Driven to the cash point and had 450 euros forcible extracted.
He was a nice chap though.
Leave a comment:
-
Clocked doing 95mph in Denmark less than a mile away from the German border.
Driven to the cash point and had 450 euros forcible extracted.
He was a nice chap though.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by nomadd View PostFWIW:
Got done the first time on the M6 for 96 mph. Had option of court appearance to plead, but admitted guilt by post instead. Result, three points and £150 fine.
Got done about four years later for 120 mph on the M40. Had no option but to "appear". Pleaded the old "I'm a one-man company and need to the car to travel to clients or I will go under... yada, yada, yada." Result was a two week ban, £200 fine and three points. NB. If you do have to appear at court, don't forget to take someone with you to drive you home, as your ban will take immediate effect (the court I had to appear in was in the middle of nowhere, over 100 miles from where I live, so using the train was not an option.)
Strangely, when I phoned the insurance companies to renew, all they wanted to know was the "code" of the offence. Mine were of the "SPxx" variety, and they didn't seem to fussed - it was "DRxx" (drink and drugs) offences they were mainly concerned about. My insurance didn't change in price at all. NB. The most recent of these offences was about 8 years ago now, so maybe things have changed since then.
As you were doing 40 mph over the posted limit, you can almost guarantee a court appearance and a short ban. You might get lucky, of course, but I'd prepare for court and ban. If this is your first offence and you have a pretty clean license, I'd skip the lawyer route and just plead in person; the advice I was given was that the magistrates hate drivers who try to weazel out of these minor offences by hiding behind a lawyer. The magistrates at my court appearance were OK people and were pretty lenient; the court usher (a nobody), was a jumped-up little Hitler in comparison. Just nod in agreement, smile politely and you'll be out of there in under 10 minutes.
Best of luck.
I presume you mean the ‘Clerk of the Court’ the user is not permitted to have a say.
The Clerk of the Court is supposed to advise the magistrates on legal technicalities, they are not allowed give their opinion on whether you are guilty or not. However, during my speeding case the magistrates vacated at let a Judge preside because I was strongly contesting the case.
The college leaver bitch Clerk of the Court got up and said “he has admitted his guilt by filling in the NIP” . I pointed out that it was an offence not to fill out the NIP and was therefore not an admission.
Another time I was in the magistrates court helping someone with council tax, when I pointed out that the council has failed to provide written evidence the magistrates were going to dismiss the case then fat bitch Clerk of the Court with PMT starts shouting and then screams “get out get out”.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Platypus View PostOh dear I got caught going very fast last night. Might lose me licence
Got done the first time on the M6 for 96 mph. Had option of court appearance to plead, but admitted guilt by post instead. Result, three points and £150 fine.
Got done about four years later for 120 mph on the M40. Had no option but to "appear". Pleaded the old "I'm a one-man company and need to the car to travel to clients or I will go under... yada, yada, yada." Result was a two week ban, £200 fine and three points. NB. If you do have to appear at court, don't forget to take someone with you to drive you home, as your ban will take immediate effect (the court I had to appear in was in the middle of nowhere, over 100 miles from where I live, so using the train was not an option.)
Strangely, when I phoned the insurance companies to renew, all they wanted to know was the "code" of the offence. Mine were of the "SPxx" variety, and they didn't seem to fussed - it was "DRxx" (drink and drugs) offences they were mainly concerned about. My insurance didn't change in price at all. NB. The most recent of these offences was about 8 years ago now, so maybe things have changed since then.
As you were doing 40 mph over the posted limit, you can almost guarantee a court appearance and a short ban. You might get lucky, of course, but I'd prepare for court and ban. If this is your first offence and you have a pretty clean license, I'd skip the lawyer route and just plead in person; the advice I was given was that the magistrates hate drivers who try to weazel out of these minor offences by hiding behind a lawyer. The magistrates at my court appearance were OK people and were pretty lenient; the court usher (a nobody), was a jumped-up little Hitler in comparison. Just nod in agreement, smile politely and you'll be out of there in under 10 minutes.
Best of luck.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SueEllen View PostSince you drive on the motorways at 60mph, which you have openly admitted, you wouldn't know what speeds people on the outside lane tailgate at.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by yasockie View PostI've been clocked at 120mph+ in US in 330HP Shelby GT and to cut things short I narrowly avoided gangraping in a Massachusets jail and I got away with a paltry $1000 (3 hours of work or so?)
HTH
Not only, is boasting about the car hes driving and how fast hes going, he also feels the need to boast about how much he earns.
Extreme willy-waving here.... :-)
Probably all too bollacks mind. Perhaps something shoved up his arse would do him some good.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostMissed out on that 2.0 Capri in your youth?
Introducing the all new BMW Boorish swine!
"More power than grip! No grip at all in bad weather!"
Only $32329,950 from all participating dealers (includes 32329,949 marketing subsidy). Fluffy dice not included.
Leave a comment:
-
You have two possible defences.
If you contract for the Police, Fire or Ambulance as the law states that "Any vehicle used for the purpose of Police, Fire or Ambulance" is exempt from road traffic regulations"
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2...0110935_en.pdf
Alternatively, if you contract for the MOD, NHS or other government department you are exempt for the law of the land as in the case of Lord Advocate v Dumbarton District Council; Lord Advocate v Strathclyde Regional Council.
Constitutional law; application of statute to Crown -- Lord Advocate v Dumbarton District Council; Lord Advocate v Strathclyde Regional Council | The Law Gazette
The law doesn’t apply to policemen spraying CS gas | Liberal Conspiracy
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Today 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
Leave a comment: