• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Anyone we know?

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Anyone we know?"

Collapse

  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by KentPhilip View Post
    Just to say it wasn't me

    (posting from Cell 14, Wing B, Pentonville Prison, N1)..
    That phone must be uncomfortable up your jacksie.

    Leave a comment:


  • kingcook
    replied
    Well there goes my plan B...

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    It was only on camera - I can't see what the harm is.

    Leave a comment:


  • KentPhilip
    replied
    Just to say it wasn't me

    (posting from Cell 14, Wing B, Pentonville Prison, N1)..

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Hack
    replied
    In fairness, whilst that comment was not from the milk of human kindness, it was from the cup of blatant honesty.

    "Here, if you let me have sex on camera with you, I'll give you £15,000 (of vouchers)".

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Nothing like the milk of human kindness in the comments.

    So the girls were prostituting themselves for a scholarships, but found out it was bogus and are now crying about it.
    - Tired of this world , Leeds, 19/7/2013 19:34
    sick puppy.

    Not sure on 16 months either.

    Nice to see the vetting is working :
    Lancaster was working as a computer contractor for the Foreign Commonwealth Office at the time of the offences and in the past has been employed by IBM, Fujitsu and the Ministry of Defence.

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    started a topic Anyone we know?

    Anyone we know?

    Must admit the plan has merit but 16 months seems a tad excessive
    This was an elaborate lie and a thoroughgoing and pitiless deception.

    ‘The appropriate sentence is one of 16 months' imprisonment and it would be quite wrong to suspend that.’

Working...
X