Originally posted by KentPhilip
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Anyone we know?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Anyone we know?"
Collapse
-
Just to say it wasn't me
(posting from Cell 14, Wing B, Pentonville Prison, N1)..
Leave a comment:
-
In fairness, whilst that comment was not from the milk of human kindness, it was from the cup of blatant honesty.
"Here, if you let me have sex on camera with you, I'll give you £15,000 (of vouchers)".
Leave a comment:
-
Nothing like the milk of human kindness in the comments.
sick puppy.So the girls were prostituting themselves for a scholarships, but found out it was bogus and are now crying about it.
- Tired of this world , Leeds, 19/7/2013 19:34
Not sure on 16 months either.
Nice to see the vetting is working :
Lancaster was working as a computer contractor for the Foreign Commonwealth Office at the time of the offences and in the past has been employed by IBM, Fujitsu and the Ministry of Defence.
Leave a comment:
-
Anyone we know?
Must admit the plan has merit but 16 months seems a tad excessive
This was an elaborate lie and a thoroughgoing and pitiless deception.
‘The appropriate sentence is one of 16 months' imprisonment and it would be quite wrong to suspend that.’Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17

Leave a comment: