Originally posted by vetran
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Mayor of Liverpool
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Mayor of Liverpool"
Collapse
-
Most objections to multiculturalism people have seem also to be objections to globalisation, capitalism, and their own fecklessness, so I'm not sure how possible it would be to overcome them.
-
except of course a Police officer can't join the BNP but can join the Black Police officer organisation (can't remember exact name but key point membership is restricted by Race unlike the BNP). Seems Ironic.Originally posted by Old Hack View PostI think the BNP are a legitimate corporation, and in that regard, it would be extremely hard to ban then. You cannot, as a business, discriminate. We know that from the Christian BnB trial.
You're right about the marches, Rock against Racism, etc. These folk will only get stronger, if you don't let them talk, for when they talk, they quickly expose themselves for what they actually are.
Only two ways of getting rid of BNP (need to do both) prosecute leadership for any offences and remove most of the objections to multiculturism that the average citizen has.
Leave a comment:
-
I think the BNP are a legitimate corporation, and in that regard, it would be extremely hard to ban then. You cannot, as a business, discriminate. We know that from the Christian BnB trial.Originally posted by darmstadt View PostQuite right. the only real way to get rid of them is for the man in the street to oppose them and protest against them. This was a problem many years ago and the public did protest, I remember going on marches and to Rock against Racism gigs, which pushed them back but in recent years they've been growing in strength to the point where they're starting to get a public voice, quite worrying.
I think the cricket club could quite easily ban them with no repercussions (apart from maybe a petrol bombing!) as there are probably some laws or such (i.e. incitement) which would back them up.
You're right about the marches, Rock against Racism, etc. These folk will only get stronger, if you don't let them talk, for when they talk, they quickly expose themselves for what they actually are.
Leave a comment:
-
Quite right. the only real way to get rid of them is for the man in the street to oppose them and protest against them. This was a problem many years ago and the public did protest, I remember going on marches and to Rock against Racism gigs, which pushed them back but in recent years they've been growing in strength to the point where they're starting to get a public voice, quite worrying.Originally posted by Old Hack View PostI'm a bit worried about where this is all going. As much as I loathe the far right, the NF and BNP especially, you can't simply ban them from talking, regardless how vile their words, and sometimes deeds, are.
I remember them Christians being given a very hard time of it, for not allowing homosexuals to sleep together, being prosecuted for it; surely, if a club, such as this cricket club, ban the NF from using it, then this too can be challenged in court.
As much as I hate them, they have just as much right to a voice as we do.
I think the cricket club could quite easily ban them with no repercussions (apart from maybe a petrol bombing!) as there are probably some laws or such (i.e. incitement) which would back them up.
Leave a comment:
-
I'm a bit worried about where this is all going. As much as I loathe the far right, the NF and BNP especially, you can't simply ban them from talking, regardless how vile their words, and sometimes deeds, are.
I remember them Christians being given a very hard time of it, for not allowing homosexuals to sleep together, being prosecuted for it; surely, if a club, such as this cricket club, ban the NF from using it, then this too can be challenged in court.
As much as I hate them, they have just as much right to a voice as we do.
Leave a comment:
-
Mayor of Liverpool
In the following story in, yep you guessed, the Mail the Mayor of Liverpool says the following:
Does he know the meaning of the word 'toss'? Is this:'It’s hard to believe that so-called human beings can stoop to this sort of level. Thankfully the little girl doesn’t seem to have understood what was going on, but these would not have known that, they wouldn’t have given a toss.
(a) a Scouse slang word that has another meaning
(b) further proof of the dumbing down of politicians
(c) who gives a wankTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Yesterday 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47

Leave a comment: