• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Up your game!

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Up your game!"

Collapse

  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    I knew you were a slow reader, I never expected you to admit it.
    Phew, that WAS a long post eek!

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by suityou01 View Post
    That's my evening's reading sorted then, thanks for the quick and concise answer.
    I knew you were a slow reader, I never expected you to admit it.

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    The triangles are a historical thing, where some councils in the past reshuffled land by dividing it in strips around a central point. Not all councils did that though.

    You also have to remember that when land was divided up in NL, water rights and responsibilities for maintaining water defenses had to be divided up among the farmers too, which explains why there are ditches and dykes between the fields.

    As for the tetris like strips; they're growing flowers in strips sowed weekly or daily and harvesting day by day or week by week to provide a continuous supply to the auctions. No point in having one big glut of flowers in one week as that would push the price down for that week and you'd earn fook all for the rest of the year, so sow strip by strip and harvest strip by strip. Apparently the biggest customers for Dutch flowers are the Italians and there's a constant stream of trucks going from Aalsmeer auction up and down to Italy.
    That's my evening's reading sorted then, thanks for the quick and concise answer.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by suityou01 View Post
    Field shaped. Fields aren't generally shaped like long thin triangles, with the apexes all on a central point, like a giant fecked up trivial pursuit counter.

    Not are they tetris shaped, or shaped like the output from WinDirstat.

    Fieldwrong example.



    Edit : Although this example looks like the windows defragger
    The triangles are a historical thing, where some councils in the past reshuffled land by dividing it in strips around a central point. Not all councils did that though.

    You also have to remember that when land was divided up in NL, water rights and responsibilities for maintaining water defenses had to be divided up among the farmers too, which explains why there are ditches and dykes between the fields.

    As for the tetris like strips; they're growing flowers in strips sowed weekly or daily and harvesting day by day or week by week to provide a continuous supply to the auctions. No point in having one big glut of flowers in one week as that would push the price down for that week and you'd earn fook all for the rest of the year, so sow strip by strip and harvest strip by strip. Apparently the biggest customers for Dutch flowers are the Italians and there's a constant stream of trucks going from Aalsmeer auction up and down to Italy.

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    What shape did you expect?
    Field shaped. Fields aren't generally shaped like long thin triangles, with the apexes all on a central point, like a giant fecked up trivial pursuit counter.

    Not are they tetris shaped, or shaped like the output from WinDirstat.

    Fieldwrong example.



    Edit : Although this example looks like the windows defragger

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by suityou01 View Post
    Mitch, I noticed while flying over Amsterdam this morning the fields are an odd shape. Why is this?

    Exibit a
    What shape did you expect?

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    Yep, keep us invoicing and we'll keep you invoicing.
    Mitch, I noticed while flying over Amsterdam this morning the fields are an odd shape. Why is this?

    Exibit a

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    Always the best approach. Give Testing no time to test so they don't test in detail. Put pressure on them to ensure it passes the tests and then blame them for not doing their job correctly when it goes wrong.
    Yep, keep us invoicing and we'll keep you invoicing.

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    Always the best approach. Give Testing no time to test so they don't test in detail. Put pressure on them to ensure it passes the tests and then blame them for not doing their job correctly when it goes wrong.
    Far better approach than listen to the contractor you are paying handsomely for, that's been using this tool for 10 years.

    NTIGAF. If they want me to fix it later, then that's more sheckles for Suity LTD.

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by suityou01 View Post
    Better yet, I warned them it was heading somewhere tulipty, advised them how to avoid the tulip, and we then ignored my advice and plotted a course for tulipsville. Now they are panicking, but no so much that they will ask me to fix it, better wait until it fails testing then do it right at the last minute while up against the clock and then sling it back through testing "Gangnam style"
    Always the best approach. Give Testing no time to test so they don't test in detail. Put pressure on them to ensure it passes the tests and then blame them for not doing their job correctly when it goes wrong.

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    is it in the tulip and rapidly getting tulipper....
    Better yet, I warned them it was heading somewhere tulipty, advised them how to avoid the tulip, and we then ignored my advice and plotted a course for tulipsville. Now they are panicking, but no so much that they will ask me to fix it, better wait until it fails testing then do it right at the last minute while up against the clock and then sling it back through testing "Gangnam style"

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by suityou01 View Post
    Perhaps I shouldn't be so tight lipped about the state of my project. I was trying to "man up".

    Any takers?
    is it in the tulip and rapidly getting tulipper....

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Perhaps I shouldn't be so tight lipped about the state of my project. I was trying to "man up".

    Any takers?

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    I tried but everyone seems to have gone away
    Fed up with watching bloody repeats.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    I tried but everyone seems to have gone away

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X