Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Ah, exotic Stockley Park.. I remember visiting Apple there for some seminars.... was in awe of the demonstrations they put on... these days my phone is possibly more powerful than the servers they had used...
No. They've also just outsourced their contractor recruitment team to Bangalore and signed up with Elance (although that's nothing to do with the CP argument), so it's looks like they're an official lost cause now.
Agreed. However that is what is happening (allegedly) - they lost their PSL status for some reason and the client expected to be able to retain staff via another PSL company at renewal, but the man from CP he say No.
Messy, and unnecessary. Bit like CP, really, come to think of it!
I guess this is the problem with restraint in general. CP indicate they might try, they have to instigate. They feel "nothing to lose now".
For the previous client it's just a huge distraction, if they think it's easier to replace a few cons than tie themselves up with their legals then they will just do so. although I don't think the cleint in question is exactly noted for allowing itself to be bullied.
To DA,
The problem as I see it is that the amount of bull sh1t that CP has brainwashed the client with. They put across that CP have temp staff (contractors) on their books. many of the contractors are treated like employees of CP and treated like temps by the end client.
If you want “inside” information I think you should at least give the name of your agency so we can knock on your door when needed.
I've never had that pleasure. In fact the only company I've got any negative opinion on are CP - they're the Foxton's of contract agencies IMO.
I think CP would be flattered by that. To be fair to Foxtons they have "raised the bar" in the estate agency world. They may be a tad on the spivvy side but they are a very effective business.
Leave a comment: