• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "How to spend 2 Billion in 5 years"

Collapse

  • SimonMac
    replied
    I would assume most of the $1bn was only paper money, the value of stock in his company rather than actual cash in his bank.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    His bird is fit mind.

    That's my take on the story.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by bless 'em all View Post
    From reading through I don't think it's a case of his losing $2 billion - but rather the fact that he doesn't appear to actually pay any of his debts.
    Yep, looks like cash flow problems in some of his sillier business ventures led to the debts compounding and court cases. He's a geek; perhaps he thought he could employ the unfortunately rather common IT startup practise of not bothering to pay creditors until they're desperate enough to strike a deal, but in other industries like property and hotels where there are bigger fish with bigger teeth than small IT contractors.

    As it says, and these might be the most sensible words I've ever seen in the Wail;

    He began investing in things outside his realm of expertise, a decision that prove to be his downfall.
    Last edited by Mich the Tester; 31 May 2013, 08:14.

    Leave a comment:


  • bless 'em all
    replied
    From reading through I don't think it's a case of his losing $2 billion - but rather the fact that he doesn't appear to actually pay any of his debts.

    If he has managed to p**s away that much money in such a short amout of time then he is a knob of the highest calibre.

    Leave a comment:


  • Scrag Meister
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    When I add up all the losses listed in the article they come to less than 100 mill so what happened to the other 1900 mill.
    My thought exactly.

    Leave a comment:


  • centurian
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    When I add up all the losses listed in the article they come to less than 100 mill so what happened to the other 1900 mill.
    It was a paper loss - he thought his house was worth that much - he read the Daily Mail

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    When I add up all the losses listed in the article they come to less than 100 mill so what happened to the other 1900 mill.

    Leave a comment:


  • alreadypacked
    started a topic How to spend 2 Billion in 5 years

    How to spend 2 Billion in 5 years

    How was he smart enough to make 2 Billion, stupid enought to blow it in 5 years

    I can understand Lotto winners blowing their money, but if you have earned it, I thought you would be more carefull.

    Another tech guy with a model girlfriend, fit right in here.

    Hundreds of millions gone! Dotcom pioneer blows fortune on extravagant mansions, failed hotels, and fine art | Mail Online
Working...
X