Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Parentheses, braces, square brackets and angle brackets are all subsets of the punctuation class "brackets". Americans would always call () parentheses.
And so we take another hesitant step on the path to true enlightenment.
Yes, they are brackets, (specifically parentheses).
This.
Parentheses, braces, square brackets and angle brackets are all subsets of the punctuation class "brackets". Americans would always call () parentheses.
I was at an interview once, where I bad mouthed a bid (explaining how I could have done it better) that had been put into my previous clients, and explaining why the bid failed (basically as the person hadn't thought about the extra sales that would have been generated if they had succeeded in their bid (the client had 30 sites and this was for one site), that greed had lost their company, theoretically, millions, by trying to recover all costs, and also profit, from one site (the winning bid was free for the first site and went on to supply the other sites). I explained in great detail how stupid this was, etc, etc. One of the 3 men on the interview panel, about 5 minutes later, explained that was a bid he'd put together.
I didn't get that gig.
Your (mis)use of brackets in this post really stressed me out.
Now I'm getting more stressed as I'm not sure if they're called BRACKETS. ((Are they?))
Sometimes it's more effective when you keep your mouth shut.
If you really want to discredit someone, without it coming back on you, try like this :
ClientCo : Hi GB9, we'd really welcome your opinions on xyz person.
GB9: I really don't have any I could share, sorry.
End of.
No gloating. Just politely decline to comment.
Indeed one way of doing it. However, I have a good (albeit fledgling) relationship with current client and they wanted an honest appraisal. I gave fact (albeit my version).
seems to me "he was escorted off the client site after he was asked to leave" should be enough.
Just the facts...
That's usually the giveaway. A couple of other people on the project were given notice, but they were professional enough to be trusted to work their notice.
I reckon you are going to get badmouthed on here as well.
NO NAMES!!!
I can cope with it. Wasn't intending to gloat, just find out if others had been in the same position. However, having wound a couple of posters up, i'm quite enjoying it.
I was once escorted off the site by the Detective Chief Inspector in charge of West Yorkshire Police Professional Standards Department, but that is a whole other story.
If someone was escorted off site by two security guards and you were escorted off site by a HR bimbo/himbo at the end of your contract, then even if you worked with them directly that all you need to say. (And look innocent when you say it.)
I was once escorted off the site by the Detective Chief Inspector in charge of West Yorkshire Police Professional Standards Department, but that is a whole other story.
I was at an interview once, where I bad mouthed a bid (explaining how I could have done it better) that had been put into my previous clients, and explaining why the bid failed (basically as the person hadn't thought about the extra sales that would have been generated if they had succeeded in their bid (the client had 30 sites and this was for one site), that greed had lost their company, theoretically, millions, by trying to recover all costs, and also profit, from one site (the winning bid was free for the first site and went on to supply the other sites). I explained in great detail how stupid this was, etc, etc. One of the 3 men on the interview panel, about 5 minutes later, explained that was a bid he'd put together.
I didn't get that gig.
It's not what you say it's the way you say it.
If someone was escorted off site by two security guards and you were escorted off site by a HR bimbo/himbo at the end of your contract, then even if you worked with them directly that all you need to say. (And look innocent when you say it.)
Leave a comment: