• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Double Banning for :handbags:"

Collapse

  • nomadd
    replied
    Originally posted by istvan View Post
    I guess we are talking about <placeholder>. First we beat the subject to death, make wise cracks, advise the thread originator, insult each other, blame each other, than all blames sasguru, and we read northernladuk's "have you searched it in stickies yet". Finally someone tells us what <placeholder> stands for.
    Couldn't you have put all that in a reusable placeholder?

    Leave a comment:


  • istvan
    replied
    Originally posted by Ketchup View Post
    Can someone point me to the thread in question? (have been neglecting CUK this morning)
    I guess we are talking about <placeholder>. First we beat the subject to death, make wise cracks, advise the thread originator, insult each other, blame each other, than all blames sasguru, and we read northernladuk's "have you searched it in stickies yet". Finally someone tells us what <placeholder> stands for.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
    I didn't ask for pictures of cocks.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
    Cor! Luvaduck!

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    Not yet. Show me some piccies of fit birds.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ketchup
    replied
    Can someone point me to the thread in question? (have been neglecting CUK this morning)

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    Why do you think you're hard enough.
    Not yet. Show me some piccies of fit birds.

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
    Double? I reckon we could make it a treble.
    Why do you think you're hard enough.

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    Double? I reckon we could make it a treble.

    Leave a comment:


  • Alias
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied


    starting??

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    started a topic Double Banning for :handbags:

    Double Banning for :handbags:

    <placeholder>

Working...
X