• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: interesting stats

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "interesting stats"

Collapse

  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2316811/JAMES-SLACK-What-Left-doesnt-want-know-Britains-200-billion-welfare-bill.html?ico=home^editors_choice
    Fail.

    Should have just said how many 4 bedroom detached houses in Chelsea could be purchased per year with all that money.

    About 2 or 3.

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    Originally posted by Scoobos View Post

    CLAIM: Only a tiny number of jobless families have large numbers of children reliant on the State for support.

    REALITY: There are 160 families on out-of-work benefits with ten or more children. This figure was cited by the Left during the debate over the case of Mick Philpott from Derby, who killed six of his 17 children in a house fire and whose lifestyle was subsidised by taxpayers.


    160 isnt a tiny number, out of 20 million potential claimants? Oh lets bring in a child murderer - cos thats what all working class scum are.
    Well, he's not claiming any more. So that's one less.
    Pretty sure both his wife and mistress were working anyway. So not the best example.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Scoobos View Post
    oo a daily mail article, that will be informative.... *cough* ffs - keep this stuff on mumsnet where it belongs. Awful awful journalism.

    In fact I'll go further and say that this is just downright offensive.

    CLAIM: Only a tiny number of jobless families have large numbers of children reliant on the State for support.

    REALITY: There are 160 families on out-of-work benefits with ten or more children. This figure was cited by the Left during the debate over the case of Mick Philpott from Derby, who killed six of his 17 children in a house fire and whose lifestyle was subsidised by taxpayers.


    160 isnt a tiny number, out of 20 million potential claimants? Oh lets bring in a child murderer - cos thats what all working class scum are.

    Absolutely disgusting...

    I tell you what, lets make them all wear armbands with a red circle on them and force all the gits to live in temporary accomodation where they can work for their keep... We'll call it a re-education camp.
    116,000 with four or more children. that isn't a tiny number.
    275,000 with above average children.

    there aren't 20million working age on benefits - disgusting reporting. 5.5 roughly.

    The alignment with Philpott is disgusting and un needed agree.

    Leave a comment:


  • Scoobos
    replied
    oo a daily mail article, that will be informative.... *cough* ffs - keep this stuff on mumsnet where it belongs. Awful awful journalism.

    In fact I'll go further and say that this is just downright offensive.

    CLAIM: Only a tiny number of jobless families have large numbers of children reliant on the State for support.

    REALITY: There are 160 families on out-of-work benefits with ten or more children. This figure was cited by the Left during the debate over the case of Mick Philpott from Derby, who killed six of his 17 children in a house fire and whose lifestyle was subsidised by taxpayers.


    160 isnt a tiny number, out of 20 million potential claimants? Oh lets bring in a child murderer - cos thats what all working class scum are.

    Absolutely disgusting...

    I tell you what, lets make them all wear armbands with a red circle on them and force all the gits to live in temporary accomodation where they can work for their keep... We'll call it a re-education camp.
    Last edited by Scoobos; 30 April 2013, 15:41.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    started a topic interesting stats

    interesting stats

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2316811/JAMES-SLACK-What-Left-doesnt-want-know-Britains-200-billion-welfare-bill.html?ico=home^editors_choice

Working...
X