• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Interviews

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Interviews"

Collapse

  • amcdonald
    replied
    Originally posted by Sysman View Post
    I was once asked to gather evidence to catch a co-worker who was a thief, so I would probably relate my experience of that.

    Have to be absolutely sure of the facts, double check, don't throw false accusations around etc.



    So did you get the gig or not and was the rate what you wanted?
    It was a permie job, my first job for a miserable 3k a year and I was expected to have my own car for the job. I ended earning more for the first year working out of hours at kfc.

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    I find second rounds harder when you had to actually do some digging to find out about them.
    Only once been asked to do a second round interview - but by then I'd accepted another gig - wouldn't have done one anyway as I figure if they can't decide on the basis of one meeting then they are either too nervous collectively to make a decision or just fannying around wasting everyone's time - either one is not a company I'd enjoy working with

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by proggy View Post
    If any of those charges are leveled at me, then they should be leveled at everyone here. I have not lied or deceived anyone about who I am.
    Ooh. a bit touchy on that subject are we?

    I was not accusing you of that.

    Leave a comment:


  • proggy
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    +1 Proggy is not a sockie. He is a one account person (.... Russell,LatteLiberal, Proggy) until the account is banned and he joins again.

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by proggy View Post
    If any of those charges are leveled at me, then they should be leveled at everyone here. I have not lied or deceived anyone about who I am.
    +1 Proggy is not a sockie. He is a one account person (.... Russell,LatteLiberal, Proggy) until the account is banned and he joins again.

    Leave a comment:


  • proggy
    replied
    Originally posted by Sysman View Post
    Short for sock puppet, it even has it's own Wiki entry
    If any of those charges are leveled at me, then they should be leveled at everyone here. I have not lied or deceived anyone about who I am.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by proggy View Post
    What is a sockie?
    Short for sock puppet, it even has it's own Wiki entry

    A sockpuppet is an online identity used for purposes of deception. The term—a reference to the manipulation of a simple hand puppet made from a sock—originally referred to a false identity assumed by a member of an internet community who spoke to, or about himself while pretending to be another person.[1] The term now includes other uses of misleading online identities, such as those created to praise, defend or support a third party or organization,[2] or to circumvent a suspension or ban from a website. A significant difference between the use of a pseudonym[3] and the creation of a sockpuppet is that the sockpuppet poses as an independent third-party unaffiliated with the puppeteer. Many online communities have a policy of blocking sockpuppets.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by amcdonald View Post
    Nope anything along the lines of with regret report your concerns to a higher authority.
    I was once asked to gather evidence to catch a co-worker who was a thief, so I would probably relate my experience of that.

    Have to be absolutely sure of the facts, double check, don't throw false accusations around etc.

    Originally posted by amcdonald View Post
    Though I did wonder if she was on the take at the interview.
    So did you get the gig or not and was the rate what you wanted?

    Leave a comment:


  • amcdonald
    replied
    Originally posted by bless 'em all View Post
    I imagine the correct answer would be "Demand 40% of the take or I go to the boss?"
    Nope anything along the lines of with regret report your concerns to a higher authority. Though I did wonder if she was on the take at the interview.

    Leave a comment:


  • bless 'em all
    replied
    Originally posted by amcdonald View Post
    My first job my soon to be boss asked what I would do if I caught her defrauding the organisation. For an internal audit job it was not a joke, or a trick question
    I imagine the correct answer would be "Demand 40% of the take or I go to the boss?"

    Leave a comment:


  • hyperD
    replied
    Originally posted by proggy View Post
    Yeah 20 seconds of witnessing another human for the first time in an unnatural situation is enough to make a informed opinion of someone.
    Hate to grate your ingrained fairness gene, but sadly, it appears to be the way we humans operate in the real world.

    Leave a comment:


  • proggy
    replied
    Originally posted by Sysman View Post
    Yet better suggestion:

    Ask what sockies he runs.

    What is a sockie?

    Leave a comment:


  • amcdonald
    replied
    Originally posted by MyUserName View Post
    Don't forget the classic question "Can you name a time when you have bribed an interviewer to get a job?"
    My first job my soon to be boss asked what I would do if I caught her defrauding the organisation. For an internal audit job it was not a joke, or a trick question

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Anyway, **** tulip tit wank bugger ****. ******* **** wank tulip tit ****.

    Glad I got that off my chest. I think I might have tourrettes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by proggy View Post
    Better suggestion, find out if the interviewee posts on forums, is he helpful? Or does he take any opportunity to put down new people due to a major inferiority complex probably resulting from having tiny genitalia and low IQ. If so reject.
    Yet better suggestion:

    Ask what sockies he runs.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X