• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "What's the catch with buying a cheap Landrovers"

Collapse

  • DaveB
    replied
    If you want a Landy for any reason other than you think they look good (ie you actually want to use it off road, for towing or as a proper working vehicle) get a Defender or an old series 3. They don't look as flash, although a fully kitted out Defender does have a certain presence, but they have bullet proof reliability and will go anywhere if you put the right tyres on them. Defenders are a bit more up market and have more modern accessories but you can fix a series three by the side of the road with basic tools and since the body work is aluminium they don't rust either.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Anyway, to answer the OP, the main catch is that you end up with a cheap Landrover, which is something I'd try and avoid personally, although I suppose it's preferable an expensive one.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
    Well, if that's where you live, where on earth are you going to park it? Or is it for the country estate?
    Haven't you been there? It's overflowing with the things.

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post

    (Thanks Five Times for pointing out that post code in the link! )
    Well, if that's where you live, where on earth are you going to park it? Or is it for the country estate?

    Leave a comment:


  • bobspud
    replied
    The disco and rr sport share the same chassis and ride quality.
    The RR is the top of the tree. Look out for autobiography or vogue for the most toys. If you are going for it I would look for a supercharged model. The turbo deasels suffer a bit of lag.

    Just remember even whe these cars are new and in good condition they are a pain in the arse. So I would budget 5k for ironing out issues if you buy something at the foot of the market.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    To answer Dim's question, the Discovery looks the best model.

    But Range Rovers look even better, if I can get a used Range Rover L322 for under about 12K

    (Thanks Five Times for pointing out that post code in the link! )

    Leave a comment:


  • bobspud
    replied
    My general view of the having owned a Range rover vogue v8 and currently owning a discovery 3 (another v8) is that they are fantastic but will go wrong at least once a year and will cost you at least a grand when they do.

    It will normally go bang the first time it gets really cold/icy/wet/or just because it wants to come inside for a bit.

    The diesels really don't return much more to the gallon than the petrol ( we get about 27mpg out of the disco and the diesel guys don't seem to get more than 29)

    Leave a comment:


  • Peoplesoft bloke
    replied
    1.8 Petrol (which many of those Freelanders are) is thirsty, gutless and suffers from that infamous Rover K-series head gasket issue. The 2.5 petrol V6 is incredibly thirsty and still only just about OK for go - and needs the twin cambelts changing at a fairly low mileage (forget exact) which is a min £400 job.

    The early diesels are the Maestro/Montego (I am not kidding) Perkins sourced diesel and are reliable, economical and totally gutless. The later Td4 is a the BMW engine from the old 3-series and Rover 75 - parts are really expensive and they aren't that reliable or economical (or fast).#

    The 4wd system has a IRD and Viscous coupling which are trouble and expensive to replace with the result that a lot of people just disconnect the rear drive altogether as they can be a few hundred each to replace/rebuild. I would test drive carefully and check all the driveshafts are actually there if you want 4WD - then go and buy a Honda HRV, CRV or a Scooby Forester or Outback.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cliphead
    replied
    New or old one of the most unreliable cars around. A mate bought a new Freelander a year ago, it was back to the garage three times in the first month to get faults fixedand apparently that's the norm.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zippy
    replied
    The petrol engined ones are very expensive to run(get diesel) , a new set of tyres will be at least £600, the insurance for mine was £800 ten feckin years ago (clean licence)) and a service (required frequently) was around £400. So, cheap to buy, but expensive to run.
    If you have the money - get one

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Which model are you looking at would help?

    Leave a comment:


  • DaveB
    replied
    They are far from economical on fuel and the early Freelanders are known to suffer from reliability problems.

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    Place up the road from me does them.

    Home Page

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    You could buy a really nice car for a lot less.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    Viewing the used Landrovers for sale here, ordered by price from low to high, some seem remarkably cheap for their mileage and general appearance.

    I wondered if there was a catch. I mean do they have 8 litre engines that guzzle fuel like a parched camel at a water hole? Or do they cost £3000 a year to service?

    Any ideas?
    I think the catch is that you´ll look like a gangsta rap wannabe.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X