Tele-Traffic, the UK manufacturer of the LTI 20.20 reject the possibility of getting erroneous speed reading from a moving vehicle. Frank Garratt, Managing Director of Tele-Traffic, says that his guns are fitted with a technology which will detect any slip effect from a moving vehicle.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: I intend to break the law
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "I intend to break the law"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Clog II The AvengerWe clocked a stationary wall at 58mph - now that's motoring
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DaveBI used to consistantly drive too fast - as in over the limit not too fast for the road - but since getting a car with cruise control I seem to have mellowed somewhat. Stick it at 70 and relax. Makes driving much less effort and saves me a fortune in fuel as well
Leave a comment:
-
I used to consistantly drive too fast - as in over the limit not too fast for the road - but since getting a car with cruise control I seem to have mellowed somewhat. Stick it at 70 and relax. Makes driving much less effort and saves me a fortune in fuel as well
Leave a comment:
-
7 years no claims here and never an accident or penalty for anything.
I ALWAYS drive at least 10-15mph above the limit if the conditions are safe. After all I want to actually get somewhere in the end.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DimPrawnI've never had a speeding ticket in my life, or any sort of road accident (have about 20+ years no claims).
And I drive like a complete ****.
Leave a comment:
-
Go to court - even if you intend to enter guilty plea, this would give you same "punishment" but ensure that scamere partnership dont get the money (which they do if you pay penalty notice) and also it would increase their costs: the whole unfair system is based on self-incrimination and it ain't right.
Leave a comment:
-
I've never had a speeding ticket in my life, or any sort of road accident (have about 20+ years no claims).
And I drive like a complete ****.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Clog II The AvengerTwelve years ago I was give a fixed penalty for speeding on a motorway. My speed was recorded at 76 mph, it was late at night, good conditions and few cars around. When I handed my documents in at the police station, even the duty constable was gob-smacked. Since then I’ve been lucky; until now. I’ve now received a notice that my car was caught speeding by a fixed camera three days ago. (must be the new electronic cameras) The recorded speed 36mph. This time on an urban dual carriageway. Apart from the fact it is highly unlikely that is was 36mph (more like 31-32mph) because I know the camera and I always check my speed passing known cameras; I feel it pointless keeping a reasonable speed in future. If I am going to be fined and have penalty points I may as well travel at 85mph on motorways and 48mph in 30mph dual carriageways because the penalty is just the same.
Leave a comment:
-
I intend to break the law
Twelve years ago I was give a fixed penalty for speeding on a motorway. My speed was recorded at 76 mph, it was late at night, good conditions and few cars around. When I handed my documents in at the police station, even the duty constable was gob-smacked. Since then I’ve been lucky; until now. I’ve now received a notice that my car was caught speeding by a fixed camera three days ago. (must be the new electronic cameras) The recorded speed 36mph. This time on an urban dual carriageway. Apart from the fact it is highly unlikely that is was 36mph (more like 31-32mph) because I know the camera and I always check my speed passing known cameras; I feel it pointless keeping a reasonable speed in future. If I am going to be fined and have penalty points I may as well travel at 85mph on motorways and 48mph in 30mph dual carriageways because the penalty is just the same.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: