From LBC - Contractor UK Bulletin Board

Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

KentPhilip replied

5 April 2013, 10:40
Had he not had such generous benefits he would not have had all those children, because there would have been no profit in it for him.

So those generous benefits have led both to the births and deaths of them.
Leave a comment:
doodab replied

5 April 2013, 08:41
He depended for his income on the hard work of others. In that respect he has more in common with politicians than with most benefit claimants.
Leave a comment:
Doggy Styles replied

5 April 2013, 08:39
Originally posted by vetran View Post

did benefits drive Phillpot?

He certainly did fill his pot with them.
Leave a comment:
vetran started a topic From LBC

5 April 2013, 08:29
From LBC

did benefits drive Phillpot?
Tags: None

Working...

X