Originally posted by lilelvis2000
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Privatising the rescue services..
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Privatising the rescue services.."
Collapse
-
Yes, and they'll use your ride in the helicopter to try and flog you financial products, then sell your details to spammers.
-
Does this mean the emergency number will become a 0870 number?
Leave a comment:
-
Gibbon - you have been Spodded. I think it was about your turn though?
Leave a comment:
-
Of course you were.Originally posted by Gibbon View PostQuite obviously I was referring to the soon to be privatised sqns, not to the whole S&R world. You just wanted to read it that way to have a rant and type some profanities/fantasies.
Leave a comment:
-
Quite obviously I was referring to the soon to be privatised sqns, not to the whole S&R world. You just wanted to read it that way to have a rant and type some profanities/fantasies.Originally posted by SupremeSpod View PostI'm not making things up, merely pointing out that the S&R service is not the sole preserve of the RAF which could be construed from your post.
Leave a comment:
-
Why not just privatise the RAF and Army.Originally posted by zeitghostThey'll be privatising the RNLI next, you watch.

Leave a comment:
-
Whether they do or they dont, I just hope they get the coast guard phone system sorted out.
I am getting fed up with blokes ringing up and asking if the coast is clear
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Gibbon View PostNo need for such a aggressive response, I was only raising concerns that civilian and military organisations operate under different rules and ethos' as well you know.
I never said it was the sole preserve of the RAF so stop making things up!
Or maybe you can't Private Pile, ho hum.I'm not making things up, merely pointing out that the S&R service is not the sole preserve of the RAF which could be construed from your post.My concern is one of attitude with health/safety + insurance to be taken into account. Will civilian crews have the same 'push on' attitude, initially when staffed by ex-RAF crews maybe, but later on and with aircraft and life insurance issues, maybe not.
Leave a comment:
-
No need for such a aggressive response, I was only raising concerns that civilian and military organisations operate under different rules and ethos' as well you know.Originally posted by SupremeSpod View PostSearch & Rescue isn't the sole preserve of the RAF, so pull your cock out of your squadron leaders arse. If anything S & R cover will increase with the appointment of Bristow.
I never said it was the sole preserve of the RAF so stop making things up!
Or maybe you can't Private Pile, ho hum.
Leave a comment:
-
Isn't it valuable flying & navigating experience though?Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post... Search & Rescue isn't the sole preserve of the RAF.
The fewer flights they have to do, the worse their expertise will be eventually, especially if the Government further limits the number of flights to reduce fuel and wear & tear costs etc.
Leave a comment:
-
Search & Rescue isn't the sole preserve of the RAF, so pull your cock out of your squadron leaders arse. If anything S & R cover will increase with the appointment of Bristow.Originally posted by Gibbon View PostMy concern is one of attitude with health/safety + insurance to be taken into account. Will civilian crews have the same 'push on' attitude, initially when staffed by ex-RAF crews maybe, but later on and with aircraft and life insurance issues, maybe not.
We already have emergency services who won't go into a lake to rescue a drowning kid and nurses who can't be arsed to feed and wash.
Leave a comment:
-
My concern is one of attitude with health/safety + insurance to be taken into account. Will civilian crews have the same 'push on' attitude, initially when staffed by ex-RAF crews maybe, but later on and with aircraft and life insurance issues, maybe not.Originally posted by SupremeSpod View PostIt makes sense. Bristow have access to more aircraft.
We already have emergency services who won't go into a lake to rescue a drowning kid and nurses who can't be arsed to feed and wash.
Leave a comment:
-
Why not give the contract to Blackwater? Then if someone is in trouble, they can just take off and nuke them from orbit. Sorted.
Leave a comment:
-
It makes sense. Bristow have access to more aircraft.Originally posted by d000hg View Post
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Today 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Yesterday 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17
- Digital ID won’t be required for Right To Work, but more compulsion looms Jan 19 07:41
- A remote IT contractor's allowable expenses: 10 must-claims in 2026 Jan 16 07:03
- New UK crypto rules now apply. Here’s how mandatory reporting affects contractors Jan 15 07:03

Leave a comment: