I'd just torch the place to be 100% honest.
If my property is TAKEN, I'd rather torch it than let some no good scummer have it.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Oh Dear: Use it or lose it
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Oh Dear: Use it or lose it"
Collapse
-
I suggest this would be challenged under the Human rights act which has already effectively killed off the adverse possession AKA squatter's rights.
The European Court said:
"The taking of property in the public interest without payment of compensation reasonably related to its value is justified only in exceptional circumstances...... this principle is not confined to taking a property for public purposes but is equally applicable to the compulsary transfer of property from one individual to another"
Leave a comment:
-
But how is that going to prop up the property market? They need to be given a house each confiscated from the filthy digusting middle class pool of second homes or buy-to-lets.
Leave a comment:
-
Very good DP, very civil minded and a great help for the cause.
Doubleplusgood.
Leave a comment:
-
I reckon I could fit 15 or so Chinese in the loft if the government are interested.
Leave a comment:
-
I'm still waiting for when the government turns around and says: "Hmmm, you appear to have a 6 bedroom detached house, we're taking 4 rooms and housing some chavs on benefits there - because it's only fair".
Leave a comment:
-
And let me guess. Councils get to keep the rent which is deducted from their alotted Gov't budgets.
Thieves.
Leave a comment:
-
You are correct...Originally posted by mcquiggdBut let me guess... there will be some exceptions, including politicians, prisoners, lunatics, and doners to the labour party ....
In Westminster or Brussels for example.Originally posted by articleAnd before any of you with empty second homes break out in a cold sweat, I should point out they are exempt, as are the houses of those people who work away from home.
Leave a comment:
-
No surprise there then.... it is the vagueness of the scheme and its openness to misinterpretation that makes it such a bad law.
Leave a comment:
-
But let me guess... there will be some exceptions, including politicians, prisoners, lunatics, and doners to the labour party ....
Oh, and immigrants
Leave a comment:
-
Property is theft comrade.Originally posted by milanbeneshttp://property.timesonline.co.uk/ar...248258,00.html
'New rules have just come into force allowing councils to take over and rent out homes that have been left empty for more than six months
On a Friday teatime, when everybody in Westminster was already on the train home and everyone else was watching the World Cup, Kelly’s department quietly outlined details of a strategy, dreamed up by John Prescott in 2004, that allows local authorities to seize houses lying empty. '
Oooops.
Milan.
Leave a comment:
-
Oh Dear: Use it or lose it
http://property.timesonline.co.uk/ar...248258,00.html
'New rules have just come into force allowing councils to take over and rent out homes that have been left empty for more than six months
On a Friday teatime, when everybody in Westminster was already on the train home and everyone else was watching the World Cup, Kelly’s department quietly outlined details of a strategy, dreamed up by John Prescott in 2004, that allows local authorities to seize houses lying empty. '
Oooops.
Milan.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36

Leave a comment: