• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Oh Dear: Use it or lose it"

Collapse

  • TheMonkey
    replied
    I'd just torch the place to be 100% honest.

    If my property is TAKEN, I'd rather torch it than let some no good scummer have it.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    I suggest this would be challenged under the Human rights act which has already effectively killed off the adverse possession AKA squatter's rights.


    The European Court said:

    "The taking of property in the public interest without payment of compensation reasonably related to its value is justified only in exceptional circumstances...... this principle is not confined to taking a property for public purposes but is equally applicable to the compulsary transfer of property from one individual to another"

    Leave a comment:


  • Lucifer Box
    replied
    But how is that going to prop up the property market? They need to be given a house each confiscated from the filthy digusting middle class pool of second homes or buy-to-lets.

    Leave a comment:


  • AlfredJPruffock
    replied
    Very good DP, very civil minded and a great help for the cause.

    Doubleplusgood.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    I reckon I could fit 15 or so Chinese in the loft if the government are interested.

    Leave a comment:


  • hyperD
    replied
    I'm still waiting for when the government turns around and says: "Hmmm, you appear to have a 6 bedroom detached house, we're taking 4 rooms and housing some chavs on benefits there - because it's only fair".

    Leave a comment:


  • BobTheCrate
    replied
    And let me guess. Councils get to keep the rent which is deducted from their alotted Gov't budgets.

    Thieves.

    Leave a comment:


  • milanbenes
    replied
    please, you're devaluing the Oh Dear.

    Milan.

    Leave a comment:


  • milanbenes
    replied
    ja ja people like you always say things like that,


    Milan.

    Leave a comment:


  • stackpole
    replied
    Originally posted by mcquiggd
    But let me guess... there will be some exceptions, including politicians, prisoners, lunatics, and doners to the labour party ....
    You are correct...
    Originally posted by article
    And before any of you with empty second homes break out in a cold sweat, I should point out they are exempt, as are the houses of those people who work away from home.
    In Westminster or Brussels for example.

    Leave a comment:


  • stackpole
    replied
    ... it is the vagueness of the scheme and its openness to misinterpretation that makes it such a bad law.
    No surprise there then.

    Leave a comment:


  • mcquiggd
    replied
    But let me guess... there will be some exceptions, including politicians, prisoners, lunatics, and doners to the labour party ....

    Oh, and immigrants

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by milanbenes
    http://property.timesonline.co.uk/ar...248258,00.html

    'New rules have just come into force allowing councils to take over and rent out homes that have been left empty for more than six months

    On a Friday teatime, when everybody in Westminster was already on the train home and everyone else was watching the World Cup, Kelly’s department quietly outlined details of a strategy, dreamed up by John Prescott in 2004, that allows local authorities to seize houses lying empty. '



    Oooops.

    Milan.
    Property is theft comrade.

    Leave a comment:


  • milanbenes
    started a topic Oh Dear: Use it or lose it

    Oh Dear: Use it or lose it

    http://property.timesonline.co.uk/ar...248258,00.html

    'New rules have just come into force allowing councils to take over and rent out homes that have been left empty for more than six months

    On a Friday teatime, when everybody in Westminster was already on the train home and everyone else was watching the World Cup, Kelly’s department quietly outlined details of a strategy, dreamed up by John Prescott in 2004, that allows local authorities to seize houses lying empty. '



    Oooops.

    Milan.

Working...
X