I'd just torch the place to be 100% honest.
If my property is TAKEN, I'd rather torch it than let some no good scummer have it.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Oh Dear: Use it or lose it
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Oh Dear: Use it or lose it"
Collapse
-
I suggest this would be challenged under the Human rights act which has already effectively killed off the adverse possession AKA squatter's rights.
The European Court said:
"The taking of property in the public interest without payment of compensation reasonably related to its value is justified only in exceptional circumstances...... this principle is not confined to taking a property for public purposes but is equally applicable to the compulsary transfer of property from one individual to another"
Leave a comment:
-
But how is that going to prop up the property market? They need to be given a house each confiscated from the filthy digusting middle class pool of second homes or buy-to-lets.
Leave a comment:
-
Very good DP, very civil minded and a great help for the cause.
Doubleplusgood.
Leave a comment:
-
I reckon I could fit 15 or so Chinese in the loft if the government are interested.
Leave a comment:
-
I'm still waiting for when the government turns around and says: "Hmmm, you appear to have a 6 bedroom detached house, we're taking 4 rooms and housing some chavs on benefits there - because it's only fair".
Leave a comment:
-
And let me guess. Councils get to keep the rent which is deducted from their alotted Gov't budgets.
Thieves.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by mcquiggdBut let me guess... there will be some exceptions, including politicians, prisoners, lunatics, and doners to the labour party ....Originally posted by articleAnd before any of you with empty second homes break out in a cold sweat, I should point out they are exempt, as are the houses of those people who work away from home.
Leave a comment:
-
... it is the vagueness of the scheme and its openness to misinterpretation that makes it such a bad law.
Leave a comment:
-
But let me guess... there will be some exceptions, including politicians, prisoners, lunatics, and doners to the labour party ....
Oh, and immigrants
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by milanbeneshttp://property.timesonline.co.uk/ar...248258,00.html
'New rules have just come into force allowing councils to take over and rent out homes that have been left empty for more than six months
On a Friday teatime, when everybody in Westminster was already on the train home and everyone else was watching the World Cup, Kelly’s department quietly outlined details of a strategy, dreamed up by John Prescott in 2004, that allows local authorities to seize houses lying empty. '
Oooops.
Milan.
Leave a comment:
-
Oh Dear: Use it or lose it
http://property.timesonline.co.uk/ar...248258,00.html
'New rules have just come into force allowing councils to take over and rent out homes that have been left empty for more than six months
On a Friday teatime, when everybody in Westminster was already on the train home and everyone else was watching the World Cup, Kelly’s department quietly outlined details of a strategy, dreamed up by John Prescott in 2004, that allows local authorities to seize houses lying empty. '
Oooops.
Milan.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Sep 18 05:45
Leave a comment: