Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Should statistics be a branch of the arts?"
There is an element of truth to your question. Certainly if you spend any time on any of the infographic sites there is some really cool stuff that is good enough to hang on a wall.
However the issue is that to use stats properly you need some prior knowledge of the market or subject you are examining and too frequently a stat or infographic is shown to someone to tell a story because they are too stupid/lazy/busy to do their own research and form the opinion via informed reasoning.
When you do things the quick way information becomes unreliable at best and at worst dangerous.
The fact that people are still tweaking stuff from 40 years ago shows a bigger problem.
A) why do they care?
B) what's the agender?
C) how much credence can we put on further work...
This fact that maths becomes subjective then puts it in with the Tate modern....
This is starting to sound like the global warming debate!
There is an element of truth to your question. Certainly if you spend any time on any of the infographic sites there is some really cool stuff that is good enough to hang on a wall.
However the issue is that to use stats properly you need some prior knowledge of the market or subject you are examining and too frequently a stat or infographic is shown to someone to tell a story because they are too stupid/lazy/busy to do their own research and form the opinion via informed reasoning.
When you do things the quick way information becomes unreliable at best and at worst dangerous.
The fact that people are still tweaking stuff from 40 years ago shows a bigger problem.
A) why do they care?
B) what's the agender?
C) how much credence can we put on further work...
This fact that maths becomes subjective then puts it in with the Tate modern....
Well Sas isa bultulipter of the highest order, and claims to be an expert on statistics, so it makes sense that stats is just bulltulipting too. Either that or Sas was bulltulipting about being an expert in it.
Well Sas isa bultulipter of the highest order, and claims to be an expert on statistics, so it makes sense that stats is just bulltulipting too. Either that or Sas was bulltulipting about being an expert in it.
Leave a comment: