Reply to: message to admin

[BrilloPad]

Poor effort. Try harder next time. Being even vaguely amusing helps.

You could have waited until I got him to the bottom of the rep charts!

[adubya]

35

[realityhack]

Poor effort. Try harder next time. Being even vaguely amusing helps.

[Zippy]

Could someone cleverer than me (which is all of you) translate that into language thickies can understand please?

OK, I'll have a go

However, I have never perceived those messages as rude, because I always assumed that your "perfectly reasoned arguments" were in fact satirical and parodic, and that your messages concerning the "bringing of facts" merely served as approbation of such assumptions.

He knows you are taking the piss, so doesn't take offence

As any post-modernist theorist of literary criticism will tell you, "il n'y a pas de hors-texte"; therefore my interpretation of what you said, and of what you then further said, cannot be wrong, or indeed "right" in the sense of being right, any more than your interpretation of what I said can be right, or indeed "wrong" in the sense of being wrong. And vice versa.

This one is a bit tricky. Something about there being no mobile phone-owning horses?

In fact, according to post-modernist literary critical theory, we can all say any old bollocks and it's entirely up to anybody else who feels like it to decide for themselves what to make of it.

Which is nice

^^^ this is the important bit

[fullyautomatix]

You have to be someone's sockie to know who Chetty is.

Just saying like.

Who is Chetty ? I have been here for a while and I havent a clue.

[BrilloPad]

Mods, are we allowed to bully fellow posters who don't want to be bullied? I just want to clarify the internetiquette of CUK, as I get terribly confused by social matters.

Isn't all fair in love and CUK general?

Though I heard someone got banned for a terrible social faux pas - at a cuk meet up they did not start with their cutlery from the outside in!

[alreadypacked]

Hi Chetty, is that you?

You have to be someone's sockie to know who Chetty is.

Just saying like.

[Doggy Styles]

Had you ignored me I might have got bored by now and gone away. Now I know you are upset I am going to carry on having a laugh. Why not learn to fit in?

Mods, are we allowed to bully fellow posters who don't want to be bullied? I just want to clarify the internetiquette of CUK, as I get terribly confused by social matters.

[BrilloPad]

Oooo you bully!

Bullying out of CUK!! Bullying out of CUK!!

Stop bullying me!

<sobs>

Should I leave the bullying up to you and NLUK?

[MarillionFan]

You are entitled to your opinion and so is FA. FA has got no objection to what you posted. If you think what FA said is that bad then contact mod or admin. But be warned - they don't like being disturbed over nothing.

Had you ignored me I might have got bored by now and gone away. Now I know you are upset I am going to carry on having a laugh. Why not learn to fit in?

Oooo you bully!

Bullying out of CUK!! Bullying out of CUK!!

[BrilloPad]

However, I have never perceived those messages as rude, because I always assumed that your "perfectly reasoned arguments" were in fact satirical and parodic, and that your messages concerning the "bringing of facts" merely served as approbation of such assumptions.

As any post-modernist theorist of literary criticism will tell you, "il n'y a pas de hors-texte"; therefore my interpretation of what you said, and of what you then further said, cannot be wrong, or indeed "right" in the sense of being right, any more than your interpretation of what I said can be right, or indeed "wrong" in the sense of being wrong. And vice versa.

In fact, according to post-modernist literary critical theory, we can all say any old bollocks and it's entirely up to anybody else who feels like it to decide for themselves what to make of it.

Which is nice

Could someone cleverer than me (which is all of you) translate that into language thickies can understand please?

[BrilloPad]

What did you expect when you made disparaging comments about my boyfriend in this thread?

And, for the record, I merely pointed out the truth. That you're the small dick loser that chatroom bullies such as yourself always are.

You are entitled to your opinion and so is FA. FA has got no objection to what you posted. If you think what FA said is that bad then contact mod or admin. But be warned - they don't like being disturbed over nothing.

Had you ignored me I might have got bored by now and gone away. Now I know you are upset I am going to carry on having a laugh. Why not learn to fit in?

[NickFitz]

Though I have sent you a few rude messages - for bringing facts into my perfectly reasoned arguments!

However, I have never perceived those messages as rude, because I always assumed that your "perfectly reasoned arguments" were in fact satirical and parodic, and that your messages concerning the "bringing of facts" merely served as approbation of such assumptions.

As any post-modernist theorist of literary criticism will tell you, "il n'y a pas de hors-texte"; therefore my interpretation of what you said, and of what you then further said, cannot be wrong, or indeed "right" in the sense of being right, any more than your interpretation of what I said can be right, or indeed "wrong" in the sense of being wrong. And vice versa.

In fact, according to post-modernist literary critical theory, we can all say any old bollocks and it's entirely up to anybody else who feels like it to decide for themselves what to make of it.

Which is nice

[Bathing With Peter]

And you havent sent rude message to anybody else is it ?

Hi Chetty, is that you?

[nomadd]

That you're the small dick loser that chatroom bullies such as yourself always are.

If someone had said that to me I would be outraged. The English is simply appalling.