• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "what is bio-ethanol?"

Collapse

  • Robinho
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    most plants get most of their carbon directly from the atmosphere, they exhale oxygen. Most land animals get their oxygen direct from the atmosphere and exhale carbon dioxide.
    Incorrect, plant roots extract oil from oil reserves in the ground. This is how they get their carbon and how they get the energy to grow.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by Robinho View Post
    Where do plants get their carbon from i wonder?
    most plants get most of their carbon directly from the atmosphere, they exhale oxygen. Most land animals get their oxygen direct from the atmosphere and exhale carbon dioxide. Aquatic species use a different method, mainly because they are under water

    Carbon dioxide levels have increased dramatically, from a biologically dangerous low, and there is very good evidence that the planet is 'greening' as a result (which, ironically, the eco fascists are doing their best to stop)



    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by Ticktock View Post
    I always thought that the argument for bio-ethanol was less to do with carbon emissions and more to do with oil shortages and being able to grow a renewable fuel source.

    I'm not sure that anyone argued that burning one carbon source would eliminate carbon emissions whilst burning another would not.
    well, you thought wrong

    carbon emissions reduced by 90%



    Leave a comment:


  • Robinho
    replied
    Originally posted by Ticktock View Post
    I always thought that the argument for bio-ethanol was less to do with carbon emissions and more to do with oil shortages and being able to grow a renewable fuel source.

    I'm not sure that anyone argued that burning one carbon source would eliminate carbon emissions whilst burning another would not.
    Where do plants get their carbon from i wonder?

    Leave a comment:


  • Ticktock
    replied
    I always thought that the argument for bio-ethanol was less to do with carbon emissions and more to do with oil shortages and being able to grow a renewable fuel source.

    I'm not sure that anyone argued that burning one carbon source would eliminate carbon emissions whilst burning another would not.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by Robinho View Post
    Ceiling-jelly could help offset the bio-fuel induced famine.
    And useful as an automatic fire extinguisher.

    When the nails melt obviously.

    Leave a comment:


  • Robinho
    replied
    Ceiling-jelly could help offset the bio-fuel induced famine.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    ok

    Now it is harder to find a greenie who ever thought that burning food was a good idea than it is to nail a jelly to the ceiling






    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    And what about Bormans, the Stringfellows of Asuncion.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Bio ethanol was the Greens latest looney idea. turn food into fuel so that we dont have to use oil and therefore reduce the amount of that magic gas, CO2, into the atmosphere.

    It had the wonderful side effect of reducing the worlds food supply, which the same loonies have been gleefully predicting for decades.

    I say 'Had', because when people realised that it was food supply that was going down and not crop production, they started to wonder what was causing the gap in the middle.

    Now it is harder to find a greenie who ever thought that burning food was a good idea than it was to find a Nazi in Germany in 1946



    Leave a comment:


  • Malcolm Buggeridge
    replied
    Meths did the trick. Hic..

    Leave a comment:


  • Malcolm Buggeridge
    started a topic what is bio-ethanol?

    what is bio-ethanol?

    I need some. Is it what used to be called meths?

Working...
X