Originally posted by BrilloPad
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Leverson
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Leverson"
Collapse
-
If that were true then did something right. Alas she got in a car with a drunk driver.Originally posted by escapeUK View PostThe time to regulate was when Diana was hounded to her death
Anyway she was so media hungry she went to a heart operation wearing make up. You have to be careful when you take the tiger by the tail.
Leave a comment:
-
They need regulation with teeth. PCC has none and by all accounts seem to be pretty useless.Originally posted by SimonMac View PostI don't think more regulation will work, most of what they did was a crime anyway, they just didn't care, or believed that what they were doing was for the greater good
It'll be really fecking annoying if Cameron ignores Leveson's reccomendations completly. All that time and money on an enquiry that they simply ignore.
Leave a comment:
-
The time to regulate was when Diana was hounded to her death, this is trivia in comparison.Originally posted by SimonMac View PostI don't think more regulation will work, most of what they did was a crime anyway, they just didn't care, or believed that what they were doing was for the greater good
Leave a comment:
-
I don't think more regulation will work, most of what they did was a crime anyway, they just didn't care, or believed that what they were doing was for the greater good
Leave a comment:
-
There's more symbiosis than account holding with the MSM and the LibLabCon parasites.
The days of Woodward and Bernstein are all but gone.
Leave a comment:
-
The press are totally out of control. They routinely break the law. Any regulating body will be totally independent and the press will be freer and fairer as a result.
Leave a comment:
-
The press should be allowed to print what they want. Its the only way to keep government in check. Anyway, if they were that bad no-one would buy what they printed. Look at Liverpool and the Sun. They learnt their lesson from that.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Today 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29

Leveson
Leave a comment: