• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Easier to get a new, better paying role when in a contract or after current one ends?"

Collapse

  • nomadd
    replied
    Originally posted by Optimus Prime View Post
    For a better rate.

    But I've been getting the feeling that agents don't want the uncertainty of waiting and then finding out that an extension or a better rate was offered and accepted at his current gig.
    This^ (..is the correct answer.)

    Leave a comment:


  • Optimus Prime
    replied
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
    The bigger question is why are you looking for a contract if you are already in one? Or is this a case of your contract ends in three weeks rather than having to give three weeks notice?

    For a better rate.

    But I've been getting the feeling that agents don't want the uncertainty of waiting and then finding out that an extension or a better rate was offered and accepted at his current gig.

    Leave a comment:


  • Robinho
    replied
    Nothing to do with lower end or higher end. Simply timing.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gibbon
    replied
    Originally posted by Robinho View Post
    I never look for contracts whilst i'm in them. I like my time off.

    Again that's irrelevant though. You are simply denying that some contracts require bums on seats quickly.
    Ok, you win, I forgot that some lower end contracts only need bums like you and not experienced engineers who know what they're doing. Thanks for clarifying my oversight.

    Leave a comment:


  • Robinho
    replied
    Originally posted by Gibbon View Post
    Look, if you're not good enough that clients won't wait for you that is not my problem.
    I never look for contracts whilst i'm in them. I like my time off.

    Again that's irrelevant though. You are simply denying that some contracts require bums on seats quickly.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gibbon
    replied
    Originally posted by Robinho View Post
    Sorry but it's still screaming of you not being able to argue your point and thus resorting to insults.
    Look, if you're not good enough that clients won't wait for you that is not my problem.

    Leave a comment:


  • nomadd
    replied
    Originally posted by jmo21 View Post
    As is often the case, agents get a lot of people applying for roles.

    Availability is one of the many things that can knock you down the pecking order of getting your CV submitted.

    You might be the best candidate by miles, but that is not as important to the agent. Filling the position as soon as possible is. They may be worried the clientco pulls the role or another agent on the PSL fills the role, or a number of other things.

    Getting their man on site is THE most important thing, for them, followed by fleecing you (and the client) on rate.
    +1

    Leave a comment:


  • jmo21
    replied
    As is often the case, agents get a lot of people applying for roles.

    Availability is one of the many things that can knock you down the pecking order of getting your CV submitted.

    You might be the best candidate by miles, but that is not as important to the agent. Filling the position as soon as possible is. They may be worried the clientco pulls the role or another agent on the PSL fills the role, or a number of other things.

    Getting their man on site is THE most important thing, for them, followed by fleecing you (and the client) on rate.
    Last edited by jmo21; 28 November 2012, 13:37.

    Leave a comment:


  • SupremeSpod
    replied
    Originally posted by Robinho View Post
    I know you think you've been very very clever here. But the fundamental flaw with your argument and thus the fundamental flaw with you calling me a cretin and therefor the reason that you yourself are a cretin, is that you have assumed that you ("me" in this transcript) are the only contractor in the entire world.
    Don't you walk into an interview thinking that you're the best person for the contract? I know I do.

    Ipso facto, I'm far cleverer than you.

    Leave a comment:


  • Robinho
    replied
    Originally posted by Gibbon View Post
    I wasn't insulting you, just describing you correctly.
    Sorry but it's still screaming of you not being able to argue your point and thus resorting to insults.

    Leave a comment:


  • Robinho
    replied
    Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
    Me : When are you looking for someone to start?
    Client : ASAP
    Me: I can't start for 3 weeks, is that ok?
    Client : Well if that's ASAP then we'll have to go with that.

    So cretin, which part don't you understand?
    I know you think you've been very very clever here. But the fundamental flaw with your argument and thus the fundamental flaw with you calling me a cretin and therefor the reason that you yourself are a cretin, is that you have assumed that you ("me" in this transcript) are the only contractor in the entire world.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gibbon
    replied
    Originally posted by Robinho View Post
    Awww you lost the argument and now you're insulting me.

    Bless, very common round these parts. Methinks there are a lot of precious egos to be protected.
    I wasn't insulting you, just describing you correctly.

    Leave a comment:


  • SupremeSpod
    replied
    Originally posted by Robinho View Post
    Awww you lost the argument and now you're insulting me.

    Bless, very common round these parts. Methinks there are a lot of precious egos to be protected.
    Me : When are you looking for someone to start?
    Client : ASAP
    Me: I can't start for 3 weeks, is that ok?
    Client : Well if that's ASAP then we'll have to go with that.

    So cretin, which part don't you understand?

    Leave a comment:


  • Robinho
    replied
    Awww you lost the argument and now you're insulting me.

    Bless, very common round these parts. Methinks there are a lot of precious egos to be protected.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gibbon
    replied
    Originally posted by Robinho View Post
    I am irrelevant and my opinion is irrelevant.
    FTFY stultissimus.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X