Originally posted by Old Hack
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Oh No....
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Oh No...."
Collapse
-
MIH isn't a provider, it's David Murray's holding company. Think he set the scheme up himself with some very expensive lawyers.
-
SHould we be approachng MIH if it well set up!Originally posted by Incognito View PostThis was a hefty bit of case law that HMRC were going to be relying on. However it was really only going to be about the wording of the arrangements. HMRC thought that MIH hadn't set the scheme up correctly.
Leave a comment:
-
This was a hefty bit of case law that HMRC were going to be relying on. However it was really only going to be about the wording of the arrangements. HMRC thought that MIH hadn't set the scheme up correctly.Originally posted by Old Hack View PostAs an aside, does them winning the EBT argument mean anything to us poor contractors?
Leave a comment:
-
As an aside, does them winning the EBT argument mean anything to us poor contractors?
Leave a comment:
-
I never signed up to that, take it up with the aforementioned poster.Originally posted by suityou01 View PostAccording to the degree educated alcoholic, you 'sweaties' manage to keep all your 'sweaty' football related banter in one thread.
Unless he's ........ completely ******* wrong for like the first time ever on the board
World first.
Leave a comment:
-
According to the degree educated alcoholic, you 'sweaties' manage to keep all your 'sweaty' football related banter in one thread.
Unless he's ........ completely ******* wrong for like the first time ever on the board
World first.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Yesterday 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17
- Digital ID won’t be required for Right To Work, but more compulsion looms Jan 19 07:41


Leave a comment: