• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Oh No....

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Oh No...."

Collapse

  • Incognito
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Hack View Post
    SHould we be approachng MIH if it well set up!
    MIH isn't a provider, it's David Murray's holding company. Think he set the scheme up himself with some very expensive lawyers.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Hack
    replied
    Originally posted by Incognito View Post
    This was a hefty bit of case law that HMRC were going to be relying on. However it was really only going to be about the wording of the arrangements. HMRC thought that MIH hadn't set the scheme up correctly.
    SHould we be approachng MIH if it well set up!

    Leave a comment:


  • Incognito
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Hack View Post
    As an aside, does them winning the EBT argument mean anything to us poor contractors?
    This was a hefty bit of case law that HMRC were going to be relying on. However it was really only going to be about the wording of the arrangements. HMRC thought that MIH hadn't set the scheme up correctly.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Hack
    replied
    As an aside, does them winning the EBT argument mean anything to us poor contractors?

    Leave a comment:


  • Incognito
    replied
    Originally posted by suityou01 View Post
    According to the degree educated alcoholic, you 'sweaties' manage to keep all your 'sweaty' football related banter in one thread.

    Unless he's ........ completely ******* wrong for like the first time ever on the board

    World first.
    I never signed up to that, take it up with the aforementioned poster.

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by Incognito View Post
    Poor Old Celtic, first team in the world to ever be pumped 2-1 twice on the same night.

    2-1

    2-1


    According to the degree educated alcoholic, you 'sweaties' manage to keep all your 'sweaty' football related banter in one thread.

    Unless he's ........ completely ******* wrong for like the first time ever on the board

    World first.

    Leave a comment:


  • Robinho
    replied
    You read Newsnet Scotland.

    Leave a comment:


  • Incognito
    started a topic Oh No....

    Oh No....

    Poor Old Celtic, first team in the world to ever be pumped 2-1 twice on the same night.

    2-1

    2-1


Working...
X