Statisticians rule! Again. - Contractor UK Bulletin Board

Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

hyperD replied

8 November 2012, 10:07
Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post

Don't be so regressive!
Leave a comment:
DimPrawn replied

8 November 2012, 10:02
Leave a comment:
Pondlife replied

8 November 2012, 09:47
Excuse me for going off on a tangent but it's cos it's a sine of the times IMHO.
Leave a comment:
minestrone replied

8 November 2012, 09:45
Hills were giving 2/9.
Leave a comment:
hyperD replied

8 November 2012, 09:39
No doubt mutuality exclusive bias and variance will factor in this thread, and the laws of probability will ensure that the least squares of CUK will not post here.
Leave a comment:
Mich the Tester replied

8 November 2012, 09:38
Originally posted by Notascooby View Post

Has anyone factored in the odds of this thread being locked? I think highly probable but that's probably just my bias.

It would fit the trend.
Leave a comment:
Notascooby replied

8 November 2012, 09:37
Has anyone factored in the odds of this thread being locked? I think highly probable but that's probably just my bias.
Leave a comment:
doomage replied

8 November 2012, 09:27
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post

I see all the standard deviants are in here already.

What are the chances of that!
Leave a comment:
Mich the Tester replied

8 November 2012, 09:15
I see all the standard deviants are in here already.
Leave a comment:
JoeyD replied

8 November 2012, 09:15
Don't know if you guys have noticed this, but some of your comments are actual puns using common terms found in statistics !!

Very cool !! I'm going to like this site.

Peace and regards,

Joe !!
Leave a comment:
DimPrawn replied

8 November 2012, 09:12
Originally posted by sasguru View Post

You're being very modish today.

Co-median eh?
Leave a comment:
DimPrawn replied

8 November 2012, 09:11
Originally posted by Pondlife View Post

Bit of a mean comment.

I'm in that sort of mode.
Leave a comment:
sasguru replied

8 November 2012, 09:11
Originally posted by Pondlife View Post

Bit of a mean comment.

You're being very modish today.
Leave a comment:
Pondlife replied

8 November 2012, 09:10
Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post

This is going to be a very average thread me thinks.

Bit of a mean comment.
Leave a comment:
sasguru replied

8 November 2012, 09:04
Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post

This is going to be a very average thread me thinks.

It will if you keep posting on it, being the outlier that you are.
Leave a comment: