• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Most beautiful machine ever?"

Collapse

  • d000hg
    replied
    Don't know about beautiful but this is pretty incredible (found via QI):

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    I think the shuttle and concord are both remarkable but I wouldn't say either is especially beautiful. Even the spitfire I feel is pretty but not beautiful, though I'm sure that's not a popular view.

    I shall have to think on what I would nominate, mind's gone blank. I do think the Team Phillips catamaran was pretty lovely:



    Except:
    a)does it count as a machine
    b)it sunk

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    I read somewhere that messerschmitts had slightly better turning performance than spits, but by an accidental design quirk the latter started juddering when their limits were about to be reached and that let their pilots take them close to the limit. But lacking any similar indication, messerschmitts couldn't, and many German pilots were killed trying and exceeding its limit.

    If that makes sense
    this will make CH hair curl


    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    The spitfire is a good candidate.

    Did you Know ?
    sorry but military history is my speciality

    did you know that the Germans captured a few spits. just as we captured a few messerschmitts.They flew them, and we flew theirs, then they evaluated them and worked out the best way to bring them down.
    They had the captured spits painted up in German livery, and occasionally had them painted back, in RAF livery to make propoganda film of them being valiantly defeated by the luftwaffe.
    Just as we had captured planes being shot down by 'the few' on film.
    (im not saying all the footage was fake, just some of it).

    The point of all this, is that there were top pilots who flew both aircraft. So if the battle of Britain was won by superior command and control, intelligence and luck, and the spitfire was not actually that much good, these blokes would know.
    And their message was clear, the RAF and the luftwaffe pilots who flew both planes said the spitfire was by far the better plane for dogfighting. due to a thousand little design advantages

    I read somewhere that messerschmitts had slightly better turning performance than spits, but by an accidental design quirk the latter started juddering when their limits were about to be reached and that let their pilots take them close to the limit. But lacking any similar indication, messerschmitts couldn't, and many German pilots were killed trying and exceeding its limit.

    If that makes sense

    Leave a comment:


  • Ruprect
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • Ruprect
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • Cliphead
    replied
    Originally posted by suityou01 View Post
    Is it too many pot noodles :
    No such thing as too many pot noodles

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by Cliphead View Post
    Can't be corrected it's not a glasses thing.
    Is it too many pot noodles :

    Leave a comment:


  • Cliphead
    replied
    Originally posted by Incognito View Post
    Whits up with the eyes? Can you not correct it?
    Originally posted by dmo View Post
    Worth £3000 on laser eye surgery to keep flying? Subjective.. (I'd do it). Can you not get new glasses or does that just not fly (geddit ) with the CAA?
    Can't be corrected it's not a glasses thing.

    Leave a comment:


  • dmo
    replied
    Originally posted by Incognito View Post
    Whits up with the eyes? Can you not correct it?
    Worth £3000 on laser eye surgery to keep flying? Subjective.. (I'd do it). Can you not get new glasses or does that just not fly (geddit ) with the CAA?

    Leave a comment:


  • dmo
    replied
    I'm more of a car person and have an appreciation for work like this C8


    Still - It's pedigree is largely associated to aviation..

    Leave a comment:


  • Incognito
    replied
    Originally posted by Cliphead View Post
    I just lost my license cos of my eyes. Fck the CAA, I'm gonna get one of these and fly it anyway.]
    Whits up with the eyes? Can you not correct it?

    Leave a comment:


  • Cliphead
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    i dont mind coming up.

    at least that way, I know you wont be sh@gging my missus while im in a drunken stoopid
    I'd be too drunk to be sure what I'm sh@ggin', lock up the cats....

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by Cliphead View Post
    Oh yeah, we should get that together
    i dont mind coming up.

    at least that way, I know you wont be sh@gging my missus while im in a drunken stoopid

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X